Explanation:
The long-running debate between the ‘rational design’ and ‘emergent process’ schools of strategy formation has involved caricatures of firms' strategic planning processes, but little empirical evidence of whether and how companies plan. Despite the presumption that environmental turbulence renders conventional strategic planning all but impossible, the evidence from the corporate sector suggests that reports of the demise of strategic planning are greatly exaggerated. The goal of this paper is to fill this empirical gap by describing the characteristics of the strategic planning systems of multinational, multibusiness companies faced with volatile, unpredictable business environments. In-depth case studies of the planning systems of eight of the world's largest oil companies identified fundamental changes in the nature and role of strategic planning since the end of the 1970s. The findings point to a possible reconciliation of ‘design’ and ‘process’ approaches to strategy formulation. The study pointed to a process of planned emergence in which strategic planning systems provided a mechanism for coordinating decentralized strategy formulation within a structure of demanding performance targets and clear corporate guidelines. The study shows that these planning systems fostered adaptation and responsiveness, but showed limited innovation and analytical sophistication
<span>Salary is the correct answer. </span>
Answer:
The answer is: He needs the price of coffee to go down to convince him to buy more.
Explanation:
A demand curve (almost) always has a negative slope. As a product gets more expensive, the amount of people willing to buy that product decreases. So if the product gets cheaper, the more people are willing to purchase it.
The opposite happens with the supply curve, as the price of a product increases, the more companies are willing to sell that product.
Answer:
$580,000
Explanation:
The computation of the asset is shown below:
= Equipment + supplies + cash + account receivable
= $244,000 + $30,000 + $215,000 + $91,000
= $580,000
We simply added the four items so that the asset value could be determined
Hence, the asset is $580,000
Answer:
An applicant tracking system (ATS) is a human resources software that acts as a database for job applicants.
