I support Andrew Jackson's claim which states that the Indian Removal was done in the best interests of American Indians.
The indian removal of the United States to Individual States brough several benefits, such as:
- It put an end to a possible <u>danger of collision.</u>
- It <u>allowed states to grow</u> rapidly in wealth, power and population, which reinforced the southwestern border.
In addition, the indian removal to the native americans contributed to:
- <u>Release the Indians</u> of the power of the state.
- Enabled them to <u>maintain their way of life</u> (culture, traditions, language, etc).
As Jackson quoted himself "The removal was necessary because the <u>Native Americans would be annihilated</u>".
I believe the answer is "C".
The forces that drove the revolution of the 1700s, 1800s, and early 1900s were <u>control, money, political reform, social reform, economic reform, coal, inventors and entrepreneurs, and textile machines. </u>
Enlightenment ideas about government provided a philosophical basis for the revolutions of the late 1700s and early 1800s.
They replaced them with more democratic forms of government. They also triggered a series of nationalist uprisings that let to the formation of new nation-states.
I wish I know that bestie
