Answer:
"Burglary (entering a building with the intent to commit a crime inside) and larceny (theft) are two different crimes, although burglaries are often committed for the purpose of theft. Burglary laws are intended to protect the sanctity and privacy of people's homes and other structures."
"Most people associate both terms with theft. But as it turns out, burglary occurs when a person enters a building for the purpose of committing a crime. ... Robbery, on the other hand, means that an assailant is forcing or threatening to force another person to give up something."
"Larceny (Theft)
To commit the crime of larceny, also known as theft, petty theft, or grand theft, a person must take someone else’s property without permission and with the intention to permanently deprive the owner of its use or possession. A theft may occur during the course of a burglary, but it can also occur as a separate incident. For example, shoplifting is theft, as is taking milk money from a schoolmate's backpack."
<h3><u>
Brainliest Please!</u></h3>
The factor should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed.
For better understanding let's explain what tort interference means
- There are two types of tortious interference
- Tortious interference with contract
- Tortious interference with good economic advantage.
- Tort interference is regarded as an issue where one party was involved in something or does a thing to intentionally disregard another party’s business transactions or project
From the above we can therefore say that the answer the factors should a plaintiff consider when deciding which interference tort applies to a situation is that:
- The plaintiff must a contract that is with a third party;
- The defendant must know about the contract at the time of the alleged interference
- The defendant must have interfered intentionallly and the interference was not right
- The actions of defendant’s led to a breach of the contract
- The plaintiff has suffered some measure of damage as a result
- The defendant knew a contract between the plaintiff and a third party existed is correct
Learn more Tort interference from:
brainly.com/question/15058912
