In <em>Mapp v. Ohio</em>, the Supreme Court ruled <u>B. If the police</u> violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.
<h3>What was the place of evidence in the case of Mapp v. Ohio?</h3>
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the state in a 5-3 vote, favoring Mapp, from whom evidence was obtained without due process.
The implication is that evidence seized unlawfully from a suspect or an accused, without a search warrant, could not be used in criminal prosecutions in state courts.
Thus, in <em>Mapp v. Ohio</em>, the Supreme Court ruled <u>B. If the police</u> violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.
Learn more about the importance of evidence in criminal prosecutions at brainly.com/question/7802791
#SPJ1
Answer:
strongly agree
Explanation:
we do more than men we raise kids and still work and cook for the man. We di the same amount of work that they do we went to college for the same year we deserve to get paid the same
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Popular culture, in this sense, is created when a certain product "advertises" a figure which is already popular. (Celebrities, Memes ect.) This is usually in the form of merchandise/branding. (Nike, Adidas, Apple).
Through stories! They told their young tales, which told their children, and so on.
Answer:
Meiji the Great.
Explanation:
Emperor Meiji, also known as Meiji the Great, was a Japanese monarch who ruled from February 1867 until his death in July 1912. He was the 122nd emperor of Japan.
I hope this helps~!