1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
avanturin [10]
3 years ago
6

Why might England have initially relied on corporate exploration/settlement rather than creating government-led colonies in Nort

h America?
History
1 answer:
Tanzania [10]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

England relied on a corporate settlement to led colonies in North America because the Company like Virginia, Plymouth and others were the part of the charters issued by the King of England. It was easier to maintain the rules and regulations then led by the government officials, who would exercise power and gain wealth for his benefit rather than giving it to his country.  British King James I gave rights to the Virginia Company, a joint-stock company to establish a colony in the New World in the beginning.

 

     

You might be interested in
What measures did groups such as the United Nations establish to try to prevent genocide following World War II? Were these meas
alexandr1967 [171]

Measures taken by groups such as the United Nations to try to prevent genocide following World War II included making the crime of genocide punishable under international law. The United Nations approved its Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG) in 1948 which was later on ratified by more than 130 countries. However, this did not prevent future genocides such as in Yugoslavia and Rwanda

4 0
4 years ago
Large-scale farming was most practiced in
Tpy6a [65]
The New England colonies
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Sunspots rarely appear in groups.<br><br><br> TrueFalse
pickupchik [31]
False. Hope this helps!!
4 0
3 years ago
4- Discuss why the supreme court give a dissenting opinion in every case
Rudik [331]

First, a judge may write a dissent to persuade the majority, and the dissenting opinion may ultimately become the majority opinion. Second, a dissent can improve the majority opinion by pointing out the majority's mistakes either in its description of the facts, the law, or in its reasoning

4 0
3 years ago
I need an answer ASAP Please!!!!
Otrada [13]
Do you have a passage or something to answer it easier?
3 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the Republican midterm victory affect<br> President Clinton?
    10·2 answers
  • How did the House of Wisdom help cultural transfers?
    9·1 answer
  • What did Benjamin Franklin proposed an idea known as the Albany Plan of Union?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following did not encourage the Latin American revolutionaries?
    8·1 answer
  • Were critics of the first world war anti-american
    15·1 answer
  • All of the activities designed to get a candidate elected to public office are called _____.
    15·1 answer
  • Which was most significant about Maryland’s act of toleration
    14·1 answer
  • After World War II, the Marshall Plan provided over $13 billion to help rebuild countries in Europe and Asia and allow them to r
    13·1 answer
  • Which are considered accomplishments of the Freedmen’s Bureau in North Carolina? Check all that apply.
    7·2 answers
  • Can somebody please give me a few examples of Maya artwork?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!