Pope's tone is lovingly taunting of the shortfalls of the high societies, and his mind, similar to the Baron's scissors, has a twofold edge. He extols the well-off and affronts them, however, he does as such in such an adjusted route, to the point that it isn't clear which see is generally noticeable. This equivocalness guarantees that the gathering of people individuals—the very focus of his mind—will be befuddled, not knowing whether to feel complimented or offended by this portrayal of their technicality. The segments in the content that appear to be most disparaging of society are found in the starting sections, where Pope remarks unreservedly on subjects, for example, legislative issues and the law. Despite the fact that Pope might not have loaned much weight to the senseless fight that roused this work, he probably looked after the general population included.
Have you considered looking at other summaries of this book? For the last one, it’s your opinion saying why or why not someone should read this book. You could say “I recommend this book to anyone who is into this book genre.” Also compare the book to other popular book series. (Will put more info in a moment)
Is there a selection of answers, in the format of A, B, C, D?
The best answer I can give you is this quote from Richard III:
"I am determined to prove a villain
And hate the idle pleasures of these days.
Plots have I laid, inductions dangerous,
By drunken prophecies, libels and dreams,"
The opposition is show through lust
Answer:
from what i know mate,
her case wasnt celebrated as it should hve been, because of her pregnency at the time,...? im not sure of clarity of the situation here, but it was something related to her being impregnated by someone who was married himself..
hope it helps somewhat mate,
