Barack Obama was the 44th President of the United States.
The reason why people classify governments by the number of people who can participate in the government is because:
The number of people that participate helps to inform or tell if its democratic or a dictatorship and the more people, there is found to be more opinions.
<h3>What is the classification of government?</h3>
The forms of government is made up of monarchy, aristocracy, timocracy, etc.
Note that it is vital for Citizens who are said to possess some set of rights and responsibilities, to also participate in decisions that affect all of the public.
Hence, The reason why people classify governments by the number of people who can participate in the government is because: The number of people that participate helps to inform or tell if its democratic or a dictatorship and the more people, there is found to be more opinions.
Learn more about governments from
brainly.com/question/1078669
#SPJ1
Hypocrisy is claiming to have moral standards to which your behavior does not conform.
Answer:
1. b) The incorporation of the 14th Amendment has consolidated power between the government at the local, state, and federal level.
2. a) The Supreme Court overturned the separate but equal doctrine in schools.
Explanation:
1. The 14th Amendment's incorporation concentrates local, state, and federal power. Section 1 of this amendment states, "No state shall abridge the rights or immunities of U.S. citizens; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; nor shall any state deny any person within its jurisdiction equal protection of the laws."
2. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka abolished the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson tenet of "separate but equal" in schools. This judgement did not say that separating pupils by race was intrinsically improper; rather, it declared that if two schools were really equal, they should be permitted to separate without legal repercussions.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to include the options for this question,
However, trying to help you, we can answer based on our knowledge of this topic.
The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that people "that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement."
We are talking about the Supreme Court case in which the Warren Court dealt with the rights of the accused: Miranda v. Arizona.
Miranda v. Arizona was a case decided by the Warren court on June 13, 1966. Ernesto Miranda had a written confession for kidnap and r*pe, but the issue was that police interrogated him without the presence of a lawyer, neither the police officers told him he had the right to call a lawyer.
The Court's decision favored Miranda, overturned his conviction and the case was sent to Arizona for retrial.
