Answer:
Option B - False
Step-by-step explanation:
Critical value is a point beyond which we normally reject the null hypothesis. Whereas, P-value is defined as the probability to the right of respective statistic which could either be Z, T or chi. Now, the benefit of using p-value is that it calculates a probability estimate which we will be able to test at any level of significance by comparing the probability directly with the significance level.
For example, let's assume that the Z-value for a particular experiment is 1.67, which will be greater than the critical value at 5% which will be 1.64. Thus, if we want to check for a different significance level of 1%, we will need to calculate a new critical value.
Whereas, if we calculate the p-value for say 1.67, it will give a value of about 0.047. This p-value can be used to reject the hypothesis at 5% significance level since 0.047 < 0.05. But with a significance level of 1%, the hypothesis can be accepted since 0.047 > 0.01.
Thus, it's clear critical values are different from P-values and they can't be used interchangeably.
To figure out the degrees, you would create a ratio.
Since there are 360 degrees in your circle, that would be representative to 100 (because both are the total of what you want to find), and x would be representative to what degrees 65 is equal to.
your ratio should look like,
65/100=x/360
cross multiply and get
65(360)=100x
23400=100x
x=234
It looks hard to read like this, but if you write it out on your paper it should make more sense!
Explanation:
If 
then taking the reciprocal gives
-2y is the answer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
