The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Based on the succession papers submitted by the Southern States to the US Government, the cause of the Civil War was primarily that the Southern states wanted to maintain slavery in their territories. Slavery was at the basis of the Southern economy. Landlords needed slaves to work for long hours in the farm fields to produce the cash crops that had to be traded and exported.
The specific examples from the Texas succession document and the Georgia document are the following.
In the Texan document, it was established that Texas consented to secede and be part of the Confederation to support and promote the welfare of the Texans, maintain internal peace in the state and the prosperity of the people.
In the case of the document of the state of Georgia, it is said that Georgia citizens decided to dissolve their relationship with the Union because they had many complaints against the federal government regarding African American slavery in their farms.
A meeting to discuss the inefficiency of the articles of confederation which was their constitution of the time.
"Like other settled, agrarian societies in history, those in the Indian subcontinent have been attacked by nomadic tribes throughout its long history. In evaluating the impact of Islam on the sub-continent, one must note that the northwestern sub-continent was a frequent target of tribes raiding from Central Asia. In that sense, the Muslim intrusions and later Muslim invasions were not dissimilar to those of the earlier invasions during the 1st millennium."
<span>Richard M. Frye, "Pre-Islamic and Early Islamic Cultures in Central Asia", in </span>Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective<span>, ed. Robert L. Canfield (Cambridge U. Press c. 1991), 35–53.</span>"
So, MUSLIMS is the answer, does it have this option?
"the power of the government is derived from the governed .John Locke believed in the right of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. He did not believe that kings had a divine right to rule, but that the people <span>of the country should choose their leader."
</span>"The Divine Rights of Kings was basically used before the Glorious Revolution. It allowed kings to be above the law; anything they say, goes. But when the Glorious Revolution came along in 1689, Parliament took power away from the king and they were no longer "above the law." They were expected to obey the law <span>just as everyone else"</span>
