It didn't and it did. Just because the case happened in 1954 doesn't mean that schools ended segregation, as a matter of fact it lasted for almost a decade more, if not longer because schools would still refuse to obey. Southern communities were especially supportive of segregation, and even when the civil rights acts were implemented they still didn't support them and they didn't want to be around African-Americans only it had to be hidden. On the other hand, when a Supreme Court makes a decision it does sway people to support it. That is because there is an idea of everyone being equal in the eyes of law and the supreme court is the judge on what is lawful and what isn't based on the constitution. Since there's no greater legal act than the constitution, when the supreme court makes a decision it means that the decision fits the constitution and for many Americans the constitution is almost a holy document that guides their lives. A negative externality can be for example the rise of extremism. During the reconstruction period Ku Klux Klan rose as a negative externality of the era. During the civil acts era they grew stronger again because racist people were enraged by things like desegregation.
it was old-school war meets new technology
Family law deals with family legal issues
You can use the equation dx+3^8+x+23+y6+3^2 to find the expanded form is
4.02 x 100,000
Is unchanged, increases.
(Depositing money into a bank reduces currency and increases demand deposit by equal amounts. If the bank keeps this entire deposit as part of its reserves, the $100 deposit has no effect on the money supply. However, if the bank lends a portion of the deposit-say $10-that portion now exists both as a demand deposit and as currency, thereby increasing the money supply.
