Answer:
a. they were 3 inches high
Answer:
Explanation:
The principal quantum number is the quantum number denoted by n and which indirectly describes the size of the electron orbital. It is always assigned an integer value (e.g., n = 1, 2, 3...), but its value may never be 0. An orbital for which n = 2 is larger, for example, than an orbital for which n = 1.
Answer:
to tell a story
Explanation:
A personal narrative is a form of storytelling that describes the personal experience of the writer. It gives the reader more details about event occurrences which the writer witnessed.
Hence, in this case, the correct answer is that the purpose of writing a personal narrative is "to tell a story."
Some other purposes if a personal narrative includes:
To demonstrate a lesson
To entertain readers with personal experience
"D. Both have served their city" is the best option from the list as to why both Eteocles and Polyneices receive honorable burials, according to Antigone.
Answer:
It fails to support its claim with specific, credible evidence and uses a disrespectful tone.
Explanation:
When giving arguments in favor or against a specific subject, they must be supported by reason and logic as well as credible evidence that can be compared with reality. They also need to be coherent with the things you are stating, this has to be done in a respectful tone as you are open to the idea of others comments and counterarguments. You are supposed to show you are right with these arguments, not by insulting or despising others.
In my opinion, this excerpt fails in both. It is not respectful and it's arguments are not strong enough.
He states that there is not proof of who is right or wrong on the debate adressed, he needs to support this with evidence. Who states that?
He the concludes that "no valid judgment can be made for everyone on whether smartphones should be banned from teens." This seems as an opinion based on his own reasoning.
After this, he starts making judgments about the people supporting the restriction, calling them naïve. This is not polite or useful. As I said, this is not based on evidence, he is contradicting himself as he stated in the first lines that there was no evidence of who was rigth or wrong.
The next lines express just his opinions based on his values and thoughts, evidence to support them is never presented.
