The answer is indirectly through dialogue
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
Option B states that anaphora to emphasize the lack of equality.
Anaphora means a word or sentence is repeatedly being used in the paragraph. President Kennedy uses "it ought to be possible" repeatedly in the excerpt. He wants to explain that Americans are not given equality in any thing, whether it may be attending a public institution or giving vote.
Answer:
D). Metro City residents with degrees outside the humanities have per capita income no higher than the per capita income of such residents of other cities of comparable size in the nation.
Explanation:
As per the question, option D displays the claim that would most appropriately empower the columnist's argument as this would substantiate his claim and establish the credibility of his argument.<u> It provides as an alternative and reasonable justification to the conclusion</u> that 'the key reason for Metro city residents having higher per capita in comparison to residents of other citizens' income is not only the lower percentage of the residents with humanities degrees' but simply <u>their higher earning is the major reason for their higher per-capita income than the residents of other states.</u> Therefore, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
Whoever reads this is an idiot and is stupid because english is better is the translation
