Answer:
The group may not want to disappoint an influential producer or investor. The second reason maybe they want to avoid a heated argument which could turn the whole project down. Another reason may an expectation of a brief meeting. Involvement in other projects which make them less concern about its success could be another reason.
Answer:
Reasons for irrational behaviour : Political brand name establishment in favour of candidate, enhancing brand loyalty towards.
More knowledgable public : Would value candidate working on real development, rather than mere brand name.
Explanation:
Political elections are determined by the public's impressions of the candidates rather than the candidates' views on the issues.
Reason(s) of such irrational voting behaviour could be : The candidate having established a personal brand image of himself/ herself, specially in a particular community group. This makes the people of the community being 'brand loyal' towards their candidate, irrespective of his or her ideologies. It is also possible to make that political personality (candidate) an important part of 'national image' or 'community leader image', which reinforce support for the candidate, irrespective of person perception and attitudes.
If public were more knowledgeable about factors that affect person perception and attitudes : The political support would not be based on lineaged political brand names. It would rather be earned on the basis of candidate's performance for socio - economic, political upliftment. This would give power in the hands of deserving politicians & create a message that 'real work' & not just 'name' is needed to gain political success
Zeus saw humans as ants, but Prometheus saw that humans had potential to become great organisms. Please Mark Brainliest!!!
Answer:
Hate Speech
Explanation:
Brad's words against Professor Williams are an example of hate speech because of the virulence, and violence embedded in the adjectives that he is using.
Brad is using his speech to discriminate against Professor Williams on the basis of a quality that the professor cannot control: his age. This is hate speech because Brad is not considering other aspects such as his intellectual capacity, teaching ability, or interpersonal skills when assessing his character.
