Answer:
C.) “I shall not turn into worms. I shall have my being.”
Explanation:
I'm unsure on how to explain this but it's the answer.
I'm sorry for answering so late, but I hope this helps!
Answer: Euripides did not cater to popular Athenian entertainment, whereas Sophocles did just that. Those two often wrote on divine matters, whereas Euripides did not.
Explanation:
The Tang Dynasty of China was notable for returning civil-service exams to use and creating the following type of society based on ability rather than birthrights:
- The type of society it created was a society based on merit.
- Yes, a society based on personal merit, knowledge, and progress, instead of birthrights.
- In Imperial China times, Civil Service Examinations were a requirement to choose the appropriate candidate to occupy an office in the government.
- During the Teng Dynasty, the government changed its military approach to a more type of bureaucratic system.
- This new system was run by Chinese civilians that had the knowledge and credentials to occupy these positions.
We conclude that one consequence of the civil service examination system used by the Tang dynasty was that Chinese government officials were selected based on their skills and abilities rather than their family history.
Learn more about this topic here:
brainly.com/question/16854281?referrer=searchResults
Explanation:
After winning the 1936 presidential election in a landslide, Franklin D. Roosevelt proposed a bill to expand the membership of the Supreme Court. The law would have added one justice to the Court for each justice over the age of 70, with a maximum of six additional justices. Roosevelt’s motive was clear – to shape the ideological balance of the Court so that it would cease striking down his New Deal legislation. As a result, the plan was widely and vehemently criticized. The law was never enacted by Congress, and Roosevelt lost a great deal of political support for having proposed it. Shortly after the president made the plan public, however, the Court upheld several government regulations of the type it had formerly found unconstitutional. In National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, for example, the Court upheld the right of the federal government to regulate labor-management relations pursuant to the National Labor Relations Act of 1935. Many have attributed this and similar decisions to a politically motivated change of heart on the part of Justice Owen Roberts, often referred to as “the switch in time that saved nine.” Some legal scholars have rejected this narrative, however, asserting that Roberts' 1937 decisions were not motivated by Roosevelt's proposal and can instead be reconciled with his prior jurisprudence.
