Answer:
False
Explanation:
Values are the set of characteristics of a particular person or organization that determine how they behave and interact with other individuals and the environment. According to this conceptualization, we can state that the information shown in the above question is false.
Thus, these values can be considered as the basis of human and social relationships, functioning as a set of norms that guide human interactions and decisions.
Through participation in the jury system, the people of a community play a direct role in the administration of justice. The jury system is also an important safeguard in preserving our democratic system of government.
There were many reasons. For starters, the entire economy was based around slaves working on plantations of things like tobacco or for making gin. Without them the state would break down because they wouldn't have the free workforce that they had when they had slaves. Also, it would also help the northern states and abolitionists since there would be more non slave than slave states.
Answer:
Religion declines with economic development. In a previous post that rattled around the Internet, I presented a scholarly explanation for this pattern: people who feel secure in this world have less interest in another one.
The basic idea is that wealth allows people to feel more secure in the sense that they are confident of having their basic needs met and expect to lead a long healthy life. In such environments, there is less of a market for religion, the primary function of which is to help people cope with stress and uncertainty.
Some readers of the previous post pointed out that the U.S. is something of an anomaly because this is a wealthy country in which religion prospers. Perhaps taking the view that one swallow makes a summer, the commentators concluded that the survival of religion here invalidates the security hypothesis. I do not agree.
Explanation:
The first point to make is that the connection between affluence and the decline of religious belief is as well-established as any such finding in the social sciences. In research of this kind, the preferred analysis strategy is some sort of line-fitting exercise. No researcher ever expects every case to fit exactly on the line, and if they did, something would be seriously wrong.
Answer:
D. (Increase taxes on citizens)
Explanation: