Answer:
I belonged to a Muslim community in Delhi. The area of Delhi is highly populated and there are very few Muslims in my area. The high density of Hindus has influenced Muslims. The Muslims had no mosque to pray in my area. I was young and had written letters to many officials for the mosque building but there was no response.
Explanation:
I then started gathering the money from the people who lived in my society and I dedicated a room in my house for prayers as a mosque. The Muslims then came to my house and performed religious beliefs. The people were really happy that they have got a place to worship freely. Since many people used to come in the room daily the room was small for such religious offerings. My one of neighbor who was Hindus also asked us to have a room in their house for prayers.
The radical American group which first emerged during the stamp act crisis was known as sons of liberty.
<h3><u>
What was stamp act crisis?</u></h3>
- The colonial populace strongly objected to the legislation, which resulted in coordinated protests that gave the revolution movement practical experience and helped establish a pattern of resistance that eventually led to American independence.
- Americans contended that there was a difference between taxing them for money and taxing them to regulate trade during the Stamp Act controversy. They argued that Britain lacked the right to tax them in order to raise money.
- The phrase "No taxation without representation" is the source of the colonies' refusal to paying taxes. They thought that when they paid taxes, the government took their private property and that they would only be able to do this with the consent of their constituents.
The Sons of Liberty was a loosely structured, covert, occasionally violent political group active in the Thirteen American Colonies that was established to advance colonist rights and oppose British government taxation.
In most colonies, it was a key factor in the fight against the Stamp Act of 1765.
Know more about stamp act crisis with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/5444522
#SPJ4
Appeals are decided by panels of three judges working together. The appellant presents legal arguments to the panel, in writing, in a document called a "brief." In the brief, the appellant tries to persuade the judges that the trial court made an error, and that its decision should be reversed.
<span>The catholic priests, nobles, lower classes and radicals.</span>
