The way people process information in threatening situations begins with a social encounter and then depends on<u> the </u><u>kind of situation</u><u> </u><u>people are in.</u>
<u></u>
<h3>What is meant by social encounter?</h3>
The social encounter is a psychosocial approach that is not what one would expect to find in a textbook on the subject. As a companion to social interaction advocated by Michael Argyle and his associates, it has been used by a rapidly growing number of researchers in social psychology and other aspects of social psychology. related aspects of mythology, anthropology and linguistics.
The two main ideas are to study the detailed processes of social interaction at the level of interacting factors and to relate social behavior to its biological basis and cultural framework.
To learn more about social encounter from given link
brainly.com/question/26664747
#SPJ4
<span> Whenever there are two or more groups that are seeking the same limited resources</span>
The word "labor" is roughly synonymous with "work" - and especially hard work, or physical work.
"Salary" is compensation for work- but not work itself.
Work is also not a reference, but far from it.
Work, however, is a human resource - and so it labour. The last option is the correct one!
Answer:
a violin is fancy and a fiddle is folksy
Explanation:
Judicial activism would make a justice more likely to alter acts of other branches of government
Judicial Activism :
Judicial activism interprets the Constitution to be in favor of contemporary values. In judicial activism, judges are able to use their powers as judges in order to correct a constitutional legal injustice. In the matter of judicial activism, the judges have a great role in creating social policies in many different areas, especially the protection of civil rights and rights of the individual and public morality. The goal of judicial activism is to create policy change when it is needed in certain circumstances.
What role should judicial philosophy play?
Judicial philosophy plays a vital role in deciding which judges are appointed to court systems. While few judges adhere to a particular philosophy 100-percent of the time, most possess an overall philosophy that is conservative, liberal, or moderate
Learn more about judicial philosophy :
brainly.com/question/20780922
#SPJ4
