I think the answer is ---> C. Associative Property of Addition
Sorry if i am wrong.
African nationalist movements had formed in each of these countries in the 1940-50s. These political parties sought peaceful, constitutional change. That is, the primarily aim of the nationalist parties was to change the constitutions of the settler colonies to recognise the rights of the majority African population.
WW2 had an important effect on Africa. Some important battles were fought in North Africa. Many Africans form French and British colonies were also recruited to fight for the Allies in Europe, Asia and North Africa. In recruiting African soldiers, the British and French emphasised that soldiers would be helping protect the word against the evils of Fascism and Nazism. At the end of the was, the returning soldiers asked following question; "Why should I give my life to keep Europe and America free, when I am not free in my own country?".
Answer:
Legislative Power Elected representatives and state senators form the legislature. They create the laws. This branch considers what should be put to a vote by the state residents.
The legislature pays the government’s bills through a budget process that analyzes the input and output of state funds. This branch of government has the power to impeach state officials in the judicial or executive branch. They also approve the governor’s nominees. And during an election, the legislative branch can serve as the tie-breaker in a governor election.
Legislative Immunity
The Texas constitution outlines two areas of immunity for state legislators: speech and debate immunity and arrest immunity.
Speech and debate immunity provides legislators with security. Government representatives know that what they do on the clock, or while in session, will not interfere in other parts of their life. This allows individuals to speak and debate freely, within their party and even across party lines.
Arrest immunity limits the powers of police and other law enforcement officials to arrest or detain legislators during the legislative session. Action could only be taken for “treason, felony, or breach of peace.”
Explanation:
this is the right answer
According to google, "<span>Russia had an autocratic government prior to the Russian Revolution, being ruled by one person, Tsar Nicholas II. It did have an elected body called the Duma, which was instituted after a small revolution in 1905 by Tsar Nicholas II, however it had virtually no power to make laws that the Tsar had to honor." Hope this helps :)</span>