<u>Beliefs of both Federalists and anti-federalists:</u>
After the proposal of the new Constitution in the United States in 1787, the process of ratification became a prime subjects of argument as there arose two side to debate on it. Those who were in favour of the ratification and activation of new Constitution were termed as Federalists whereas those who were not thinking so, called the anti-federalists. Here are the prime beliefs of both the sides.
The Prime beliefs of both sides on the new Constitution's ratification
Belief of Federalists:
- The proposed Constitution was important for the survival and further development of the nation.
- A strong Government was necessary to excel after the previous failed Confederations.
Belief of Non-Federalists:
- The powers of the government, mentioned in the constitution was specifically granted and prohibited for doing more than that.
- The powers were separated into three groups rather than giving the complete authority an individual to control tyranny.
- The Constitution provided the system of checks and balances which wasn't required as all the branches were able to take care of their checks and balances.
- The Constitution provided addendum powers to the federal courts at the expense of the domestic courts which was unfair.
It was decided to a 7-1 majority ruled under the constitutionality of racial segregation laws under the “separate but equal” doctrine
First: Rapid increase of divorce, with the undermining of the sanctity of the home, which is the basis of society.
<span>Second: Higher and higher taxes; the spending of money for bread and celebrations.
</span><span>Third: The mad craze for pleasure, sports becoming every year more exciting and more brutal.
</span><span>Fourth: The building of gigantic armaments, when the real enemy was within; the decadence of the people.
</span><span>Fifth: The decay of religion; faith fading into mere form, losing touch with life, and becoming impotent to guide it.</span>
The argument by supporters of the Fugitive Slave Law that the Constitution and laws passed by Congress should be obeyed is valid.
<h3>What was the Fugitive Slave Law?</h3>
The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was the Congress act that required that runaway slaves should be returned to their owners by force.
The Fugitive Slave Law was part of the Douglas Compromise of 1850. Through the act, the federal government became responsible for:
- Finding
- Returning
- Trying
- Fining escaped slaves.
Since Congress is responsible for making laws and amending the Constitution of the United States, any laws that it passes must be obeyed.
However, Congress should never be engaged in passing unjust or discriminating laws, especially the likes of the Fugitive Slave Law.
Thus, the argument by supporters of the Fugitive Slave Law that the Constitution and laws passed by Congress should be obeyed is valid.
Learn more about the powers of Congress at brainly.com/question/14336660
