Lincolns reconstruction plan was to offer the south and all former confederate's amenity or pardon. His plan also stated that southern states if having a 10% vote from it's citizens would be reimbursed into the union and a new constitution written for that state. Unlike the radical Republicans Reconstruction plan. Lincoln wanted them to rejoin the union as quickly as possible. johnsons plan took up the threads where lincoln took off. Johnson's plan was similar to lincolns but pleased congress and the radical republicans because President Johnson started sofisticating land from the wealthy aristrocratic Southerners. Hope that helped.
I think the answer is france, but only 70% sure.
To serve and protect the states
Answer: Historiography for the Purpose of Nationalism.
Explanation:
The emergence of nationalism in a world dating back to the late eighteenth century. Get your full swing in the next two. Nationalism is reflected through all pores of political, social and scientific life. The emergence of nationalism also reflected on historiography.
Many historians have been encouraged by nationalism. Many of these works have emerged as a result of these tendencies. It is often a syndrome of lesser value because myths characterize most of these historical works. Their scientific value is also called into question. The historian must be objective when writing. The question is, where does this phenomenon come from? Nationalism in historiography seeks to portray, one national entity as larger than another. That is, to minorize another. A patriot historian can be objective, unlike a nationalist.
Answer:Federalist Ten is a document written by James Madison in the late 1700s. In his paper, Madison is making two arguments regarding the main differences between a democracy and a republic. He believes that a republic is superior to a democracy because a democracy cannot prevent the violence in factions.
Explanation:
Written by James Madison, this essay defended the form of republican government proposed by the Constitution. Critics of the Constitution argued that the proposed federal government was too large and would be unresponsive to the people. In response, Madison explored majority rule v. minority rights in this essay.
