PLEASE ANSWER WITH NO LINKS THIS IS MY 3RD TIME ASKING THE SAME QUESTION Shopping at Savers Mart, Lisa buys her children 4 shirt
1 answer:
You might be interested in
You mean 
or 
?
If you had meant,, then the simplest form of this fraction would be - 
Divide both parts of the fraction by 4, and you getthe simplest form of the fraction.
Finding out the simplest form of a given fraction is nothing else than cancelation.
Flop it, you have with you -
Flop the simplest form of the previous fraction, that's
If you had meant, then this will certainly be of any use to you.
HOW TO UNDERSTAND THAT THE FRACTION IS IN ITS SIMPLEST FORM?
Maybe, you are just simplifying and simplifying...but you don't even know when to stop. You can understand whether a fraction is in its simplest form or not by seeing that the numerator and the denominator have a common factor to divide it by, or not.
For instance, consider the case here - or <span>. We can't divide it any further. So, we know that it is in its simplest form.
</span>
L O N G Process:
Well, if you want to divide it by the smallest common factor to its larger, then --
or
1) Divided by 2 =
or 
2) Next, also by 2 = or
That took much longer, right.<span> So, it is more preferable to divide the fraction by the possible largest common factor, you can guess of.</span>
If you had meant,
Divide both parts of the fraction by 4, and you get
Finding out the simplest form of a given fraction is nothing else than cancelation.
Flop it, you have with you -
Flop the simplest form of the previous fraction, that's
If you had meant
HOW TO UNDERSTAND THAT THE FRACTION IS IN ITS SIMPLEST FORM?
Maybe, you are just simplifying and simplifying...but you don't even know when to stop. You can understand whether a fraction is in its simplest form or not by seeing that the numerator and the denominator have a common factor to divide it by, or not.
For instance, consider the case here -
</span>
L O N G Process:
Well, if you want to divide it by the smallest common factor to its larger, then --
1) Divided by 2 =
2) Next, also by 2 =
That took much longer, right.<span> So, it is more preferable to divide the fraction by the possible largest common factor, you can guess of.</span>
The time taken by the first and the second train is 1 hour 40 minutes and 1 hour 25 minutes. Then the time when the second train at Niles junction is 5:55 p.m.
<h3>What is speed?</h3>The distance covered by the particle or the body in an hour is called speed. It is a scalar quantity. It is the ratio of distance to time.
We know that the speed formula
A train leaves Thorn junction at 1:25 p.m. and arrives in Niles at 3:05 p.m. the train makes two stops along the route for a total of 15 minutes.
A second train leaves Thorn junction at 4:30 p.m. and heads to Niles.
This train does not make any stops.
Let the speed of both trains be equal.
Then the time taken by the first train will be
t₁ = 3:05 p.m. - 1:25 p.m.
t₁ = 1 hour 40 minutes
Then the time taken by the second train will be
t₂ = 1:40 - 00:15
t₂ = 1:25 = 1 hour 25 minutes
The time when the second train is at Niles junction will be
→ 4:30 p.m. + 1:25
→ 5:55 p.m.
More about the speed link is given below.
#SPJ1