Leading up to the Civil War the South had an economy based on agriculture and slave labor while the North had an

History

1 answer:

bagirrra123 [75]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Manufacturing

Explanation:

Before the Civil War, the South had an economy based on agriculture and slave labor. They focused on crops such as silk, cotton, food crops and cash crops and made a lot of money from them. They were also heavily involved in slave labour due to their heavy reliance on labor for their farmlands.

However the North was heavily reliant on manufacturing. This helped the North in the war as they manufactured weapons and other equipments for their use.

You might be interested in

How did whites gain control of some Chute-pa-lu? To what extent did conflicting concepts of land ownership divide the Chute-pa-l

Arturiano [62]

The whites gained the control of Chutepalu when they invited the chiefs that the tribe had to a meeting with the council and then they promised them that they would have their own country if only they signed a treaty that would have them to give up their lands.

<h3>How the Chute-Pa-lu lost their lands</h3>

In the year 1877, one of the chiefs had refused that they would relinquish their lands to the white people in the area. This was met by a fight were he was defeated by the white people. He and his people were then moved to Fort Leavenworth from there to Baxter Springs, Kansas, and finally to Indian Territory

Hence we can say that The whites gained the control of Chute-pa-lu when they invited the chiefs that the tribe had to a meeting with the council and then they promised them that they would have their own country if only they signed a treaty that would have them to give up their lands.

Read more on the Chute-Pa-lu here: brainly.com/question/17373599

#SPJ1

8 0

1 year ago

Which were factors in the United States' failure to achieve its goals in Vietnam?

MArishka [77]

I know I am 3 years late but your answer is A and C Hope it helps whoever sees this lol

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In a few words, identify the key differences between Aristotle's definitions of tragedy and comedy

bazaltina [42]

According to Aristotle, both tragedy and epic are forms of imitation. Tragedy imitates directly by means of mimesis and epic both directly and indirectly by means of mimesis and diegesis. While epic imitates solely by means of words, tragedy also imitates by means of spectacle. Both epic and tragedy portray people better or greater than the average spectator, unlike comedy which portrays people as worse than they actually are and uses humour to dissuade us from acting badly (Aristotle's lost treatise on comedy may be summarized in the Tractatus Coislinianus; see also Eco, The Name of the Rose for interesting view of Aristotle on comedy)

Due to practical constraints of production, tragedy ideally has a single unified action which is often restricted to a specific time and place. and a small n umber of characters, while epic has a broader scope of coverage.

7 0

3 years ago

Bartolome Diaz returned with news of making it around the southern tip of Africa to Asia. Which is not a direct result of that d

Marina86 [1]

"A" would be the correct answer. Even though the main goal of the voyage was to find a different sea route to Asia. Bartolome and other Portuguese explorer have also made stops along the African coast and started to realize how could of an alternative they would be compared to the Mediterranean trade routes.

I'm positive with the answer tho

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Please help me this is very important

Llana [10]

I think the last one is correct because Robert created ways trough Missouri River to get faster to the ocean

7 0

3 years ago