Answer:
Number 1 and 2 are correct. Number 3 is "yes". Number 4 is "yes". Number 5 is "no". Number 6 is "no". Number 7 is "yes". Number 8 is "no".
Explanation:
Number one isn't fair because the juvenile wouldn't know what to say and would be confused about what's happening or going to happen because they didn't have enough time to prepare. Number 2 isn't fair because she might say something that she didn't know she was/wasn't supposed to say that the lawyer would have told her. Number 3 is fair because they aren't supposed to lie in court and the judge needs to know what happened to know how much trouble the person gets and who gets it. Number 4 is fair because since the person is underage and doesn't have enough money to buy a lawyer, the court should assign one to the juvenile. Number 5 is no because the judge or the person going against the juvenile could say something that never happened or never been said at the hearing. Number 6 is no because there's nothing against the juvenile about what happened and he/she could be innocent. Number 7 is yes because the court needs all the evidence and proof about what happened so the judge knows what to do. Number 8 is no because the parents might not be able to make it because they might forget the date of the hearing and they need writing for when the date is and where the hearing is, incase they forgot. I really hope i helped.
Answer:
The answer is not B
Explanation:
I just took the test and picked floodplains so if your on ED then don't pick that one
Answer:
Abstract
The political context of and approaches to program evaluation in the United States and in developing countries are compared. A framework for discussing the political context of evaluation in developing countries is proposed. This framework includes who funds, uses, controls, and conducts the evaluations; what kinds of evaluations are used by major stakeholders; and how and why evaluations are used. Some of the emerging issues are discussed.
Although the political nature of evaluation is accepted as a fact of life by American evaluators, there has been very little systematic discussion of these issues with respect to evaluation in developing countries. Probably the single most important difference between the context for program evaluation in the United States and that in developing countries is the major role that international donor agencies play in the selection, financing, design, and use of monitoring and evaluation systems in developing countries.
Another important issue is that in many developing countries monitoring and evaluation systems are often highly centralized, with priority given to the information needs of central finance and planning agencies. Consequently, evaluation in developing countries is used less as a project management tool than in the United States. Also in contrast to the United States, where the need for stakeholder analysis is widely acknowledged, project beneficiaries in developing countries frequently receive very limited attention from both donors and governments and have no voice in the design, implementation, or use of the evaluations.
Explanation:
Your Free Read It
<h2>
Brainlist nalang </h2>
Answer:
Cooking Enthusiasts
Explanation:
Cooking Enthusiasts enjoy cooking, and cook to spend time with their families.
“The Gobi Desert is dangerous and dry. There is a little water, but is rare, and an oasis is very rare. The Taklamakan Desert, China's other desert, is the second largest desert in the world. ... Crossing the Taklamakan is dangerous and can be deadly.” (china.mrdonn.org)
