Answer: I believe that is true :)
Explanation:
Answer:
When the schools are reviwed the only action that represents a less structured approach that teachers use is:
Explanation:
First of all, we need to understand the question. We need to find the worst structured approach teachers use. The structure depends on the organization of the activity. That is the measure we take into account to define which one is the worst.
a) asking questions of the students. This is the less structured approach because not all of them will work, only a few will do, also the questions will be open and the teacher can't control or orientate the curse of their questions because he has no control over their minds.
b) allowing the students to work in small groups requires rules, requires an objective, requires an organization, a distribution of the activities, an objective, and the analysis of information to create a learning experience. So it's incorrect.
c) Presenting materials to the students require a high level of organization because they need to explain a topic and organize the information to make sure they understand the message. So this is incorrect.
d) This is a highly structured activity because the activities take the curriculum as an object to create the activities and achieve the objectives of the curriculum so it's incorrect.
Advantages: moderate buying and selling
disadvantages: less 'freedom' for the buyer and sellers
Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
"Rosa, who operates a Street Tacos restaurant in her apartment, is charged with criminal violations of the local health and building codes, state license regulations, and federal environmental statutes. To obtain a conviction, the prosecution must
a. persuade three-fourths of the jurors to agree on a guilty verdict. b. show the evidence as reasonably permitting a guilty verdict. c. convince the court it is more likely than not that the charges are true d. prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Rosa committed every essential element of an offense."
Answer:
b. show the evidence as reasonably permitting a guilty verdict.
Explanation:
When convicting someone for the practice of a criminal offense, the judge imposes the penal sanction that the law provides: penalties of imprisonment, detention, simple imprisonment, restrictive rights and a fine. This conviction has other effects, both criminal and extra-penal. However, for a conviction to be carried out, the judge must reach a conclusion that the defendant is guilty. In order to reach this conclusion, it is necessary to show evidence that proves that the defendant is acting in disagreement with the law and therefore should be punished.
In the case shown in the question, for Rosa to receive a sentence, the charge imposed on her must show evidence as reasonably allowing a guilty verdict.
OK I know that #11 is the cell wall and #10 is the mitocondria that's all I know sorry
