1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sidana [21]
3 years ago
15

I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST

Mathematics
2 answers:
Mamont248 [21]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

y=3x+7

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's called miles traveled x. And charge y

So the equation

y=3x+7

geniusboy [140]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

y= 7x+ 7

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
(2x^3-3x^2-18x-8) / (x-4)
eimsori [14]
<u>2x³ - 3x² - 18x - 8</u> = 2x² + 5x + 2
           x - 4
7 0
3 years ago
How much is 1 in 100,000,000 as a percentage
Morgarella [4.7K]

Answer:

The answer is 0.000.000.01

5 0
3 years ago
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
AB has a vértices at (-5,1) and (-3,7). After a transformation, the image had endpoints at (3,-1) and (5,5). Describe the transf
Scrat [10]
That looks like a translation; let's check.  We have

A(-5,1), B(-3,7), A'(3,-1), B'(5,5)

If it's a translation by T(x,y) we'd have

A' = A + T

B' = B + T

so 

T = A' - A = (3,-1) - (-5,1) = (8,-2)

and also 

T = B' - B = (5, 5) - (-3, 7) = (8,-2)

They're the same so we've verified this transformation is a translation by (8,-2), eight right, two down.

 



5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Find the slope of the line through the given points (1,6),(-8,-9)
cestrela7 [59]
The answer to the question

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the value of 3x divided by (10 - x) when 2x + 5 = 85
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes a tangent of a circle?
    7·1 answer
  • HELP 15 POINT AND WILL MARK BRIANLYEST. Emma said that when you multiply three negative decimals, the product will be positive.
    5·2 answers
  • A salesperson earns $200 a week plus 4% commission on her sales. Which equation models the relationship between her sales in a g
    12·2 answers
  • An injection-molded part is likely to be obtained from any one of 8 cavities on a mold. Round your answers to three decimal plac
    15·1 answer
  • A hyperbola has its center at (0,0), a vertex of (20,0 and an asymptote of y= 13/20x. find the equation that describes the hyber
    6·1 answer
  • What is the area of the trapezoid?<br> 6 feet<br> 8 feet<br> 10 feet
    13·2 answers
  • Help me !!!<br> !!<br> !!<br> !!
    13·1 answer
  • I need help pls I’m really dumb
    13·1 answer
  • Function g is defined by g(x)=3(x+8) what is the value of g(12)
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!