Answer:
yes
Step-by-step explanation:
because the corresponding angles are congruent, the triangles are congruent through CPCTC. If two sides are congruent and an included angle, then the triangles are congruent through the SAS postulate. And if two sides and a non-included angle are congruent then the triangles are congruent through the AAS postulate. Any way of looking at this proves congruency through various postulates, therefore the trianlges are congruent.
Yes that is correct to my knowledge
Answer:Second Step
Step-by-step explanation:
On the right side in step two you added -3b-15b, and ended up with -12b. This is incorrect. -3b-15b is actually -18b

you'll get a decimal format, just multiply it times 100, to get the % format
Answer: 92
Step-by-step explanation: Angles in an inscribed quad are supplementary and add to 360.
First solve for x:
2x+34=180
x = 73
Then, solve for c
3x + 49 + c = 360
3(73) + 49 + c = 360
268 + c = 360
c = 92