Answer:
Gross margin $22,346
Explanation:
The computation of the gross margin is shown below:
Sales $66,300
less:
Direct material $15,900
Direct labor $14,430
Overhead $13,624 ($16,244 ÷ 310× 260)
Gross margin $22,346
Hence, the gross margin is $22,346
Answer:
player 2 is signing a better contract
Explanation:
the present value of an annuity (player 1) = annual payment x annuity factor
assuming that the interest rate is 10%
present value = $10 million x 6.1446 (PV annuity factor, 10%, 10 periods) = $61.446 million
player 2's contract
the present value of a growing annuity = [payment / (i - g)] x {1 - [(1 + g) / (1 + i)]ⁿ} = [$10 / (10% - 5%)] x {1 - [(1 + 5%) / (1 + 10%)]¹⁰} = $200 x 0.372 = $74.398 million
Explanation:
The benefits that organizations offer their employees are essential to add value to the job function. Through them, it is possible for the organization to attract and retain qualified employees, in addition to creating a favorable and positive organizational environment for the development of professional skills. The benefits help to motivate the employee and improve the perception and appreciation of their position and the company.
The benefits that most add value to employees are health and retirement plans, in addition to dental plans, paid vacations, etc. These benefits are not mandatory for the employer, but they are great differentials in differentiating jobs in the view of individuals.
Answer:
The totals of Trial balance have a difference of $8,000. The credit balance totals of Trial balance is higher than the debit totals because the original entry of debit is mission and there is an wrong posing on the credit side which reduce the debit balance by $4,000 and Increase the credit balance by $4,000 at the same time. Net effect will be $8,000 in totals of trial balance.
Answer:
The answer is: Alais will prevail because of material breach of the contract
Explanation:
Material breach in contract law refers to one party failing to perform under the contract significantly enough so that the aggrieved party has the right to sue for breach of contract.
In this case when Rutherford failed to perform, Alais sustained enough "damage" that enables her to sue Rutherford. She probably was no longer able to finish her job in time.