Answer:
Desing A is a better deal as the equivalent annual cost is lower than desing B
Anywa, bot desing cost are above the city collections thus, it cannot afford the sanitary systems unless it raises taxes
Explanation:
<em><u>Desing A </u></em>
F0 405,000
operating and maintenance cost 51,000 for 14 years
Present value of the operating and maintenance cost:
C = $ 51,000.00
time = 14 years
rate = 0.07
PV $446,018.8673
net worth: $ 851,081.87
equivalent annual cost:
PV 851,082
time 14
rate 0.07
C $ 97,316.904
<u><em>Desing B</em></u>
F0 251,000
operating and maintenance cost 89,000 for 14 years
C 89,000.00
time 14
rate 0.07
PV $778,346.6507
net worth: $ 1,029,346.65
equivalent annual cost:
C $ 117,700.580
Answer:
cost of goods sold = $580
Explanation:
The cost of the goods sold means the cost price of the total sales volume. As the company uses FIFO (First-in, First-out) method and also uses the perpetual inventory system, the cost of goods sold =
Cost of goods sold =
20 units × $19 = $380 (The price is from November 1)
10 units × $20 = $200 (The price is from November 10)
The total cost of goods sold (30 units) = $580
Answer:
-9.92%
Explanation:
P₀ = Div₁ / (Re - g)
- Div₁ = next year's expected dividend = $1.12 x (1 - 11.5%) = $0.9912
- Re = cost of equity = ?
- P₀ = current stock price = $62.91
- g = dividend's growth rate = -11.5%
Re = (Div₁ / P₀) + g
Re = ($0.9912 / $62.91) - 11.5%
Re = 1.58% - 11.5% = -9.92%
Since the cost of equity or required rate of return cannot be negative, I suppose that investors are not worried about Abbott distributing dividends, instead, they prefer that the company reinvests earnings in new projects.
If you need to indicate the missing ammount of each letter in the grahp then it will be like follows:
For the first case:
A = $9,600 + $5,000 + $8,000 = $22,600$22,600 + $1,000 – B = $17,000
B = $22,600 + $1,000 – $17,000 = $6,600$17,000 + C = $20,000
C = $20,000 – $17,000 = $3,000
D = $20,000 – $3,400 = $16,600
<span>E = ($24,500 – $2,500) – $16,600 = $5,400
</span><span>F = $5,400 – $2,500 = $2,900
</span>And now for the second case:
G + $8,000 + $4,000 = $16,000
G = $16,000 – $8,000 – $4,000 = $4,000$16,000 + H – $3,000 = $22,000
H = $22,000 + $3,000 – $16,000 = $9,000(I – $1,400) – K = $7,000(I – $1,400) – $22,800 = $7,000
<span>I = $1,400 + $22,800 + $7,000 = $31,200
</span>J = $22,000 + $3,300 = $25,300
K = $25,300 – $2,500 = $22,800$7,000 – L = $5,000
<span>L = $2,000</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": hygiene factors.
Explanation:
According to American psychologist Frederick Herzberg (1923-2000) in his Motivation-Hygiene Theory -<em>also known as Two Factor Theory</em>- some factors lead to individuals' satisfaction and dissatisfaction at work. Achievement, recognition, and growth are examples of factors that lead to satisfaction and policies, supervision, salaries or security influence dissatisfaction.
Though, <em>solving problems related to dissatisfaction will not make employees satisfied. Herzberg concluded that the opposite of satisfaction is no satisfaction and the opposite of dissatisfaction is no dissatisfaction.</em>
