<span>For Jefferson, the basic elements of the argument for separation lie in a lack of respect. Jefferson frames the argument that the violation of economic and political rights that the Colonists have had to suffer were the result of a lack of respect. Jefferson is emphatic in how the British government has refused to "assent" to the basic principles of dignity and decency that could enable a successful relationship and partnership to develop. For Jefferson, the critical argument that makes rebellion and dissolution absolute is that this lack of respect will not depart. As long as this imbalance exists, the Colonists will be treated in a secondary manner, denying them their full voice and activation of their rights. It is in this light where I think Jefferson's key arguments lie. In the second section regarding the "Grievances" that the Colonists have borne, Jefferson outlines all that has been done. In doing so, he solidifies his initial argument that separation from Great Britain is the only path that the Colonists can pursue. The relationship between both nations has been so degraded by a lack of respect that there is no other option.
rephrase this in your own words</span>
Answer:
it changes by culters they developed lots of cultures
Explanation:
Without answers from your question, the best translation is, "Laws that fortified racial segregation and hate towards African Americans".
Andrew Jackson won. He basically kicked native americans out of their land and made them move. There was also a debate about whether Jackson was acting like a king or was just a good president.
IDK if this helped...
Imperialism is essentially a manifestation of the balance and the process which nations try to achieve a change. The main purpose of imperialism was to decrease the strategic and political vulnerability of the nation. The goal of European countries who practice imperialism was to spread their culture; language, religion, government and education systems to other regions
