1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dolphi86 [110]
3 years ago
15

Put commas and write the following numbers in Indian system of

Mathematics
1 answer:
Alenkinab [10]3 years ago
8 0

<em><u>1</u></em><em><u>.</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>Indian </u></em><em><u>System</u></em><em><u>:</u></em><em><u>-</u></em><em><u> </u></em>

(a) 23,45,678

(b) 56,78,090

<em><u>2</u></em><em><u>.</u></em> <em><u>International</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>System</u></em><em><u>:</u></em><em><u>-</u></em><em><u> </u></em>

(a) 234,589

(b) 9,807,062

You might be interested in
Sherry claims that the expression 1x will always be equivalent to a repeating decimal whenever x is an odd number greater than 1
Zinaida [17]

This question is not complete

Complete Question

Sherry claims that the expression 1/x will always be equivalent to a repeating decimal whenever x is an odd number greater than 1.

Which of these values of x will prove Sherry's claim is false?

Answer:

When x = 5

Step-by-step explanation:

Sherry claims that the expression 1/x will always be equivalent to a repeating decimal whenever x is an odd number greater than 1.

Examples of odd numbers greater than 1 : 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 ....

We would put these odd numbers to test

a) When x = 3

= 1/3 = 0.3333333333

b) When x = 5

= 1/5 = 0.2

c) When x = 7

= 1/7 = 0.142857142

d) When x = 9

= 1/9 = 0.1111111111

e) When x = 11

= 1/11 = 0.0909090909

From the above calculation, we can see that the only odd number greater than 1 that will prove Sherry's theory wrong is when x = 5

Therefore, the value of x that will prove Sherry's claim is false is when x = 5

3 0
3 years ago
In a test of the effectiveness of garlic for lowering​ cholesterol, 8181 subjects were treated with raw garlic. Cholesterol leve
xz_007 [3.2K]

Answer:

With garlic​ treatment, the mean change in LDL cholesterol is not greater than 0.

Step-by-step explanation:

The dependent <em>t</em>-test (also known as the paired <em>t</em>-test or paired samples <em>t</em>-test) compares the two means associated groups to conclude if there is a statistically significant difference amid these two means.

In this case a paired <em>t</em>-test is used to determine the effectiveness of garlic for lowering​ cholesterol.

A random sample of 81 subjects were treated with raw garlic. Cholesterol levels were measured before and after the treatment.

The hypothesis for the test can be defined as follows:

<em>H₀</em>: With garlic​ treatment, the mean change in LDL cholesterol is not greater than 0, i.e. <em>d</em> ≤ 0.

<em>Hₐ</em>: With garlic​ treatment, the mean change in LDL cholesterol is greater than 0, i.e. <em>d</em> > 0.

The information provided is:

\bar d=0.40\\SD_{d}=16.2\\\alpha =0.01

Compute the test statistic value as follows:

t=\frac{\bar d}{SD_{d}/\sqrt{n}}\\\\=\frac{0.40}{16.2/\sqrt{81}}\\\\=0.22

The test statistic value is 0.22.

Decision rule:

If the <em>p</em>-value of the test is less than the significance level then the null hypothesis will be rejected and vice-versa.

Compute the <em>p</em>-value of the test as follows:

p-value=P(t_{n-1}>0.22)\\=P(t_{80}>0.22)\\=0.4132

*Use a <em>t</em>-table.

The <em>p</em>-value of the test is 0.4132.

<em>p-</em>value= 0.4132 > <em>α</em> = 0.01

The null hypothesis was failed to be rejected.

Thus, it can be concluded that with garlic​ treatment, the mean change in LDL cholesterol is not greater than 0.

3 0
3 years ago
Conservationists tagged 120 ​black-nosed rabbits in a national forest in 1990. In 1991​, they tagged 240 ​black-nosed rabbits in
Sauron [17]

Answer:

Hence after period of 9 years from 1990 t0 1999 will be 61438 rabbits.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Population for rabbit obeys exponential law.

120 at 1990 and 240 1991 ...after 1 year time period

To Find:

After 9 year  time period how many rabbits will be there.

Solution:

Exponential law goes on present value and various value and time period and defined as ,

let Y be present value Y0 previous year value  and k exponential constant and t be time period.

So

Y=Y0e^(kt)

Here Y=240  ,Y0=120  t=1 year time period

So

240=120e^(k*1)

240/120=e^k

2=e^k

Now taking log on both side, [natural log]

ln(2)=ln(e^k)

ln(2)=kln(e)

k=ln(2)

k=0.6931

For t=9 year of time period

Y0=120,  t=9  ,k=0.6931

Y=Y0e^(k*t)

Y=120*e^(0.6931*9)

=120e^6.2383

=61438.48

=61438 rabbits

8 0
4 years ago
Jessica has 48 sticker.This is 8 times as many stickers as Taylor has.How many stickers does Taylor have?
allochka39001 [22]
Taylor has six stickers
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELPPP PLEASEEE ASAPP
garri49 [273]

Answer:

1.7

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 6n+6m-m-3n i dont understand that question
    5·1 answer
  • Help with this question, PLEASE ASAP!!
    15·1 answer
  • What integer describes gaining 5 pounds?
    9·2 answers
  • Can anyone solve this Ill give 25 points
    5·1 answer
  • X times 1/4 = 3/20. What is x
    7·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer.
    11·1 answer
  • Find the distance between each pair of points.
    13·1 answer
  • A 45 foot ladder is set against the side of a house so that it reaches up 27 feet. If Nicole grabs the ladder at its base and pu
    11·1 answer
  • A triangle has vertices at A(5, 7), B(1, 1), and C(5, 1). Find the area of the triangle.
    10·1 answer
  • What is the difference between solid and hollow cone?​
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!