An ??????
Well to figure this out, we will use mathematics. You do 90% of the an and then do 39 which is close to 90 and then because it has 9 in the number that is given. So, 213 is incorrect. 90% of the things like 213, = 39. And if it equals 39, then here comes 90. 90 comes in as a number to help, but 213 does to. So we will divide the number 9. 9 = 2, and since 213 has the first digit 2 in the number, that means that the answer is An number that equals 2 is the common side of two consecutive angles in a polygon.
Just a answer!
Without LCD :
1/2(4x + 6) = 1/3(9x - 24)
2x + 3 = 3x - 8
2x - 3x = -8 - 3
-x = - 11
x = 11
with LCD :
1/2(4x + 6) = 1/3(9x - 24) ...multiply by 6
3(4x + 6) = 2(9x - 24)
12x + 18 = 18x - 48
12x - 18x = -48 - 18
-6x = - 66
x = -66/-6
x = 11
Yes, the answers are the same :)
<span>Simplifying
2x + 8y = 10
Solving
2x + 8y = 10
Solving for variable 'x'.
Move all terms containing x to the left,
all other terms to the right.
Add '-8y' to each side of the equation.
2x + 8y + -8y = 10 + -8y
Combine like terms: 8y + -8y = 0
2x + 0 = 10 + -8y
2x = 10 + -8y
Divide each side by '2'.
x = 5 + -4y
Simplifying
x = 5 + -4y</span>
Answer:
Pvalue = 0.1505
y = 0.550x1 + 3.600x2 + 7.300
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the data :
Study Hours GPA ACT Score
5 4 27
5 2 18
5 3 18
1 3 20
2 4 21
Using technology, the Pvalue obtained using the Fratio :
F = MSregression / MSresidual = 30.228571/ 8.190476 = 3.69
The Pvalue for the regression equation is:
Using the Pvalue from Fratio calculator :
F(1, 3), 3.69 = 0.1505
Using the Pvalue approach :
At α = 0.01
Pvalue > α ; Hence, we fail to reject H0 and conclude that ; There is not enough evidence to show that the relationship is statistically significant.
The regression equation :
y = A1x1 + A2x2 +... AnXn
y = 0.550x1 + 3.600x2 + 7.300
x1 and x2 are the predictor variables ;
y = predicted variable