How did the Supreme Court rule the hirabayashi v United States and why?

History

1 answer:

Daniel [21]2 years ago

6 0

BACKGROUND:

In the wake of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, President Roosevelt issued two executive orders which were quickly enacted into law. One gave the Secretary of War the power to designate certain parts of the country "military areas" and exclude certain persons from them. The second established the War Relocation Authority which had the power to remove, maintain, and supervise persons who were excluded from the military areas.

<h3>ANSWER</h3>

The Court held that the application of curfews against members of a minority group was constitutional when the nation was at war with the country from which that group originated.

The Court focused solely on the curfew, which the Court viewed as a necessary "protective measure." Stone argued that racial discrimination was justified since "in time of war residents having ethnic affiliations with an invading enemy may be a greater source of danger than those of a different ancestry."

You might be interested in

Did Britain believe in mercantilism

umka21 [38]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

The way that they kept their economy healthy was through a system called mercantilism. The British even put taxes called duties on imported goods to discourage this practice. This pushed the colonists to buy only British goods, instead of goods from other European countries.

8 0

3 years ago

In what ways did napleons actions doing his dream of creating a French empire in Europe

vichka [17]

Napoleon caused a lot of things to happen

7 0

2 years ago

HELP WITH ONE MORE QUESTION!!!!! What was the purpose of the japanese expansion, and what were affects from this?

Vera_Pavlovna [14]

Answer:

go to this websight it will explain a lot

Explanation:

http://afe.easia.columbia.edu/special/japan_1900_power.htm

4 0

3 years ago

Which of the following was a reason why cash crops in early America were profitable? A. They were sold in different areas of the

balu736 [363]

The answer is either a or b<span />

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Please help me, I don't know what to do.

Aloiza [94]

Answer: I don’t think that wealthy people should be punished because they are making more money then others and I think that nontaxable amount should be raised. Having said that, all citizens must pay equal tax but tax percentage on some goods and services should be lower so more people could get access to them (like taxes on baby equipment that should be lower and therefore prices would be lower). Furthermore, even though with tax money from both rich and less rich persons, transportation is being financed not all of them use public transports.

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago