You could say life became easier, people no longer had to move from place to place. They could also spend time on hobbies instead of always growing food. They began to settle down in villages to a safer easier life.
Answer:
diplomacy of the United States—particularly during President William Howard Taft's presidential term—was a form of American foreign policy to minimize the use or threat of military force and instead further its aims in Latin America and East Asia through the use of its economic power by guaranteeing loans made to foreign countries.[1] In his message to Congress on 3 December 1912, Taft summarized the policy of Dollar Diplomacy:
The diplomacy of the present administration has sought to respond to modern ideas of commercial intercourse. This policy has been characterized as substituting dollars for bullets. It is one that appeals alike to idealistic humanitarian sentiments, to the dictates of sound policy and strategy, and to legitimate commercial aims.[2]
Dollar diplomacy was not new, as the use of diplomacy to promote commercial interest dates from the early years of the Republic. However, under Taft, the State Department was more active than ever in encouraging and supporting American bankers and industrialists in securing new opportunities abroad. Bailey finds that dollar diplomacy was designed to make both people in foreign lands and the American investors prosper.[3]
The concept is relevant to both Liberia, where American loans were given in 1913, and Latin America. Latin Americans tend to use the term "dollar diplomacy" disparagingly to show their disapproval of the role that the U.S. government and U.S. corporations have played in using economic, diplomatic and military power to open up foreign markets. When Woodrow Wilson became president in March 1913, he immediately canceled all support for Dollar diplomacy. Historians agree that Taft's Dollar diplomacy was a failure everywhere. In the Far East, it alienated Japan and Russia and created a deep suspicion among the other powers hostile to American motives.[4][5]
women were viewed as inferior to men.
The first one because he gave many speeches about culture and people why they should be able to ha g out and participate with whoever they want
Life, freedom and the quest for bliss essentially did not appear to be steady with the act of asset subjugation. How could a gathering of individuals feel so enthusiastic about these unalienable rights, yet keep up the severe routine with regards to human servitude? Some way or another bondage would figure out how to endure the progressive time, however incredible changes were conveyed to this PECULIAR INSTITUTION all things considered.
The world's first ANTISLAVERY SOCIETY was established in 1775 by Quakers in Philadelphia, the year the Revolution started. By 1788, somewhere around thirteen of these clubs were known to exist in the American settlements. Some Northern states restricted servitude inside and out, and some accommodated the slow end of subjection. At any rate, the atmosphere of the Revolution made the organization unsatisfactory in the brains of numerous Northerners, who did not depend on constrained work as a feature of the financial framework. Northerners did not, be that as it may, venture to give break even with rights to liberated blacks. Regardless, this touched off the philosophical discussion that would be pursued all through the following century.
Numerous slaves accomplished their opportunity amid the Revolution without formal EMANCIPATION. The British armed force, anxious to corrupt the frontier economy, liberated numerous slaves as they traveled through the American South. Numerous slaves in the North were allowed their opportunity in the event that they consented to battle for the American reason. In spite of the fact that an unmistakable greater part of African Americans stayed in subjugation, the development of free dark networks in America was significantly cultivated by the War for American Independence. Progressive slants prompted the restricting of the importation of slaves in 1807.
Servitude did not end medium-term in America. Before any important change could occur, individuals expected to perceive that the monetary advantage was boundlessly eclipsed by the staggering offensiveness, unethical behavior, and cruelty of bondage.
Hope this helps good luck.
