Answer: it can bring moral outrage and lead to trade sanctions
Explanation:
They lost their work force. They had to fall back onto shared cropping. It would be like owning a business, then all of your employees quit and you are not allowed to hire any more
The correct answer is C) They would be angry because such development would severely limit their only access to freshwater in the region.
<em>If Turkey were to build twenty more dams on these rivers, this most likely affects Syria and Iraq in that they would be angry because such development would severely limit their only access to freshwater in the region. </em>
Turkey, Syria, and Iraq have been faced with water problems since many years ago. Water is a scarce resource in the Middle East due to desert conditions and is a big issue for these countries. Syria, Turkey, and Iraq have not reached an agreement on a water settlement over the Rivers Tigris and Euphrates because Syria and Turkey have built dams to generate electricity and store water, and this reduces the water supply in Iraq. So the real thing is that each country has its own interests and agendas and neither of them has considered the other nation's necessities in order to reach a fair agreement for the three of them.
The entrance of the United States into World War II was preceded by 3. American aid to help Great Britain defend itself against German aggression. Using policies like "cash and carry" and the Lend-Lease Act, the US was able to provide ships, arms, and supplies with the Allied forces without actually joining the war. Eventually, however, the United States would in fact be drawn to war and send troops overseas to fight the Axis forces.
