The Indian subcontinent was partitioned into "<span>India and Pakistan" due mostly to religious differences. Although it did mitigate some conflict it has not prevented long-term religious conflict from being an issue in the region. </span><span />
C) Reestablished controls on prices, wages, and rents.
In 1946, a joint resolution of Congress extended the price controls enacted during World War II for an extra year past their initially planned end date, in order to help as the country transitioned to a peacetime economy. The government wanted to get away from price controls, but didn't want to do so too abruptly. The joint resolution (passed in July, 1946), included this statement: "It is hereby declared to be the policy of the Congress that the Office of Price Administration, and other agencies of the Government, shall use their price, subsidy, and other powers to promote the earliest practicable balance between production and the demand therefor of commodities under their control, and that the general control of prices and the use of subsidy powers shall, subject to other specific provisions of this Act, be terminated as rapidly as possible consistent with the policies and purposes set forth in this section and in no event later than June 30, 1947, and on that date the Office of Price Administration shall be abolished.
"
So there was a temporary extension of the price control measures, reestablished or extended by the joint resolution of Congress.
The 1950 Supreme Court decision to ban "separate but equal" law schools in Texas was:
SWEATT v. PAINTER
Details:
The case of <em>Sweatt v. Painter (</em>1950), challenged the "separate but equal" doctrine regarding racial segregated schooling which had been asserted by an earlier case, <em>Plessy v. Ferguson</em> (1896).
Heman Marion Sweatt was a black man who was not allowed admission into the School of Law of the University of Texas. Theophilus Painter was the president of the University of Texas at the time. So that's where the names in the lawsuit came from.
In the case, which made its way to the US Supreme Court, the ultimate decision was that forcing Mr. Sweatt to attend law school elsewhere failed to meet the "separate but equal" standard, because other schools available to him as a black man had lesser facilities, and he would be excluded from interaction with future lawyers who were attending the state university's law school, available only to white students. The school experience would need to be truly equal in order for the "separate but equal" policy to be valid.
In 1954, another Supreme Court decision went even further. <em>Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka </em>extended civil liberties to all Americans in regard to access to all levels of education. The <em>Plessy v. Ferguson </em>case had said that separate, segregated public facilities were acceptable as long as the facilities offered were equal in quality. In <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>, segregation was shown to create inequality, and the Supreme Court unanimously ruled segregation to be unconstitutional. After the Brown v. Board of Education decision, there was a struggle to get states to implement the new policy of desegregated schools, but eventually they were compelled to do so.
Edo Japan is Toyko because that's what they renamed Edo but in 1615-1868 it was called "The Floating World.
As regards the assembled crowd’s purpose of dedicating the cemetery, Lincoln concluded that it is the necessary and proper way to honor the dead.
<h3>What did Lincoln conclude at Gettysburg?</h3>
In Lincoln's famous Gettysburg Address, he spoke at a cemetery that had been built for for Union soldiers who died in the Civil War.
When he saw the crowd that had assembled to dedicate the cemetery, he used words such as sacred and hallow to show that he believed it was the proper way to honor the dead.
Find out more on the Gettysburg Address at brainly.com/question/27406002
#SPJ1