Answer:
The societies of Iberia and England in their colonial attempts in the Americas were similar.
Explanation:
Both the societies of Iberia and England tried to establish colonies in the New World to get wealthy and land. Acquiring colonies also showed the power in Europe as it provided resources. Both pushed Native Indians from their land. Many of them were killed and died because of diseases which they were no immune to it. Iberian colonies established with strict social hierarchy and maintained the same religion, forms of government, institutions, and language. England colonies came up with settlers who escape persecution because of their religious views. Colonies established with English traditions, customs, and the same English language.
The colonies were dependent on the native populations. Gradually, colonies grew different from Europe as they were part of the mercantile system, which made them different through social and economic.
Answer:
Option B. share-croppers is the answer
Explanation:
Social tensions and schism was seen in between people based on their color, race and ethnicities. African Americans were taken as share croppers or the tenant farmers.
Jim Crow laws came into existence which prohibited racial discrimination in the public place. Plessey and Ferguson case lead to the amendment of constitution which stated ‘separate but equal doctrine’ which itself inwardly violates the law of equality.
The right to poll or contest in election was not granted and this made the African Americans to migrate to north. Many protests were demonstrated to express their apprehension over ethnic discrimination.
It is "<span>extension of slavery."
</span>
The late 19th-century United States is probably best known for the vast expansion of its industrial plant and output. At the heart of these huge increases was the mass production of goods by machines. This process was first introduced and perfected by British textile manufacturers.
In the century since such mechanization had begun, machines had replaced highly skilled craftspeople in one industry after another. By the 1870s, machines were knitting stockings and stitching shirts and dresses, cutting and stitching leather for shoes, and producing nails by the millions. By reducing labor costs, such machines not only reduced manufacturing costs but lowered prices manufacturers charged consumers. In short, machine production created a growing abundance of products at cheaper prices.
Mechanization also had less desirable effects. For one, machines changed the way people worked. Skilled craftspeople of earlier days had the satisfaction of seeing a product through from beginning to end. When they saw a knife, or barrel, or shirt or dress, they had a sense of accomplishment. Machines, on the other hand, tended to subdivide production down into many small repetitive tasks with workers often doing only a single task. The pace of work usually became faster and faster; work was often performed in factories built to house the machines. Finally, factory managers began to enforce an industrial discipline, forcing workers to work set--often very long--hours.
One result of mechanization and factory production was the growing attractiveness of labor organization. To be sure, craft guilds had been around a long time. Now, however, there were increasing reasons for workers to join labor unions. Such labor unions were not notably successful in organizing large numbers of workers in the late 19th century. Still, unions were able to organize a variety of strikes and other work stoppages that served to publicize their grievances about working conditions and wages. Even so, labor unions did not gain even close to equal footing with businesses and industries until the economic chaos of the 1930s.
