I think D is the best answer choice. for a work written around the time of the salem witch trials, you can better understand why extreme fear and condemnation of witchcraft might show up, and the author's purpose is a major thing to understand a work. C doesn't really make sense, because historical context is based on facts, so the context doesn't so much help you understand an author's attitude/opinion. B is true to some degree, but D is still a stronger answer as B is somewhat circular; historical context is an inherent part of a historical character? and A doesn't even make sense to me but i personally would go with D
The best comparison of the authors’ purpose in these two essays about genetically modified food is:
- The purpose of both essays is to persuade the reader of a specific point of view.
<h3 /><h3>What is the Purpose of a Text?</h3>
A text can serve different purposes. The aim could be to inform, entertain, or persuade the listener.
So when the author in two different essays described the effects of genetically modified foods, his intent was to convince the readers of his own point of view. His views were backed with facts.
Learn more about the purpose of a text here:
brainly.com/question/1119015
#SPJ1
Apply thoroughly to avoid skin damage
Answer:
C. Section 55 - Her mind was still on the ball. His mind was on work the next day.
Explanation:
As one of Maupassant's themes is the "differences between men and women", we see that option C is the only reference that actually shows the contrast.
The above option which shows the contrast is actually referring to the differences between a man and a woman. In option C, we see that "Her mind was still on the ball" and while "His mind was on work the next day".
The reference tends to show the difference mindsets the man and the woman have.
