We need to notice that SSSS does not exist as a method to prove that parallelograms are congruent
Counterexample
As we can see we have the same measure of the side of the intern angles of the figures are different therefore we can't use SSSS to prove congruence
Q- A $420 55' flat screen tv is on sale for 40%, what is the cost of the flat screen tv now?
A-168 the tv now cost $168 dollars
<u>Given</u>:
Given that the surface area of the cone is 54 square inches.
We need to determine the surface area of the cone that is similar to the cone three times large.
<u>Surface area of the similar cone:</u>
Let us determine the surface area of the similar cone.
The surface area of the similar cone can be determined by multiplying the surface area of the cone by 3. Because it is given that the similar cone is three times large.
Thus, we have;


Thus, the surface area of the similar cone is 162 square inches.
Answer:
(2/3, 17/3)
Step-by-step explanation:
put x and y coordinates value in given equation to check equality. it equality holds that's the coordinates we are looking for.
here 2nd coordinate holds the equality
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
The first answer is correct because we have a decay factor.
The sample is losing mass, so the number that is being multiplied by a power of x must be less than 1.
If the second answer were used, then the sample would be gaining mass.