1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ella [17]
3 years ago
10

How is the poverty rate linked to income distribution?​

History
1 answer:
klasskru [66]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

A very great proportion of the population is concentrated toward the bottom of the income distribution, and the poverty rate is highly sensitive to where the line is drawn.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What different forms of government evolved in ancient greece
otez555 [7]
Im pretty sure that was a direct democracy?
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain the rational as to why people created government
nata0808 [166]

Answer:

Explanation:

Problem Solving

Identifying Basic Rights

Think of a right you believe all people should have. For example, you probably agree that everyone in the United States has the right to be protected from robbers and burglars. The belief that everyone should have this protection is shared by most people in the United States. We hear about it on television, in the newspaper, and in discussions.

Individually or in small groups, explain how you think rights like the one you have identified can be protected.

Defining "Natural Rights"

Most people in the American colonies believed that everyone had a right to life, liberty, and property. These rights were called natural rights. (Sometimes these are now called basic rights or fundamental rights.) The idea of natural rights means that all persons have these rights just because they are human beings. Everyone is born with these rights and they should not be taken away without a person's agreement.

Many of the Founders believed people receive these rights from God. Others believed that people have them just because it is natural for people to have them.

John Locke was a famous English philosopher. He lived from 1632 to 1704. He had written a book called Two Treatises of Civil Government (1690). In that book he wrote about natural rights. He said that the main purpose of government should be to protect the people's natural rights. He also said that kings should not have absolute power, that is, power without limits. They should not be able to deprive people of their natural rights.

Many Americans had read Locke's book, and they agreed with what it said about government. Those who had not actually read Locke's book knew his ideas from newspapers, political pamphlets, church sermons, and discussions.

Protecting Natural Rights

Although people agreed on certain natural rights, they worried about how those rights could be protected. Locke and others thought about what life would be like in a situation where there was no government and no laws. They called this situation a state of nature. They were afraid that in a state of nature their rights would be taken away.

Think what your classroom might be like if there were no rules.

Problem Solving

It's your turn to think like a philosopher

Imagine what life might be like in a state of nature. Think what your classroom might be like if there were no rules. Think what might happen if the teacher didn't have the right to tell anyone what to do.

Work together in groups of about five to answer the following questions about such a situation. Then choose a person to explain your answers to the rest of the class. Then compare your answers with John Locke's which follow.

What might be the advantages and disadvantages of living in a state of nature?

What might happen to people's rights?

What might life be like for everyone?

Compare Your List with John Locke's

You may have seen the same disadvantages in a state of nature that John Locke saw. Locke believed:

The stronger and smarter people might try to take away other people's lives, liberty, or property.

Weaker people might band together and take away the rights of the stronger and smarter people.

People would be unprotected and insecure.

The Social Compact

John Locke and other philosophers developed a solution to the problems that exist in a place without government. In a state of nature, people might feel free to do anything they want to do. However, their rights would not be protected and they would feel insecure.

Locke argued that people should agree with one another to give up some of their freedom in exchange for protection and security. They should consent to follow some laws in exchange for the protection that these laws would give them. This agreement is called a social compact or social contract. A social compact is an agreement people make among themselves to create a government to rule them and protect their natural rights. In this agreement the people consent to obey the laws created by that government.

In a later lesson, you will study the Declaration of Independence. You will see how the Founders included all of the ideas you have studied in this lesson in the Declaration.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement best describes federalism? It is the authority to make and enforce decisions based on a written constitution. It
tatiyna

The correct answer for above statement is:

It is the division of powers between a national government and the state governments" is the best option in terms of the description of federalism, on which the US government is based.

Explanation:

Federalism is the combined or composite method of government, connecting a global management (the central or 'federal' government) with provincial governments (provincial, state, cantonal, regional or other sub-unit governments) in a single political system. Its distinguishing feature, represented in the founding example of modern federalism by the United States of America under the Constitution of 1787, is a relationship of parity between the two levels of management established. It can thus be defined as a form of government in which there is a separation of powers between two levels of administration of equal rank

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the significance of the English Bill of Rights on the development of the U.S Constitution?
guapka [62]

Some believed that the Constitution did not give the new federal government the ability to restrict inherent rights, so no list of those rights was necessary. Others worried that if the rights were listed, they would invariably forget some and the list would ever be incomplete. Finally, the argument was that the states each had their own constitutions, too, and that rights were best protected at a state level.

6 0
4 years ago
The 1896 Supreme Court ruling of Plessy v. Ferguson reinforced an already established American policy of
cupoosta [38]

the Supreme Court ruled that the separation of races .... racial discrimination reinforced by the federal government's actions and policies

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were members of the Women's Social and Political Union called? ***impressionists, suffragettes, Chartists, social Darwinist
    9·2 answers
  • What can you conclude about a website if it ends in .gov?
    10·1 answer
  • Which best defines the phrase "end of the Cold War"?
    9·2 answers
  • German-Soviet Non-aggression pact document analysis
    7·1 answer
  • How many languages has Anne Frank’s diary been published in
    8·2 answers
  • How do favelas lead to pollution?
    5·1 answer
  • How might the course of American history have changed if the Bill of Right discrimination of all kinds and had protected the rig
    7·1 answer
  • Congress's powers under the Articles of Confederation Passing laws that apply to all states ? Printing and borrowing money O A.
    13·1 answer
  • The president appoints these people to their jobs: ____________________________.
    11·1 answer
  • How can i write my own definition for humanism
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!