Answer:
In Griffin v. California, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination not only allows a criminal defendant to refuse to take the witness stand during his trial, but it also bars the prosecutor from urging the jury to interpret that silence as an indication that the defendant has something to hide. The Court reasons that the right against self-incrimination would be meaningless if a defendant’s exercise of the right could be used against him.
Hope this helps
Answer:
Sorry for your loss, and Happy Veterans Day!
Explanation:
Answer:
I believe that someone could argue xenophobia in that case. Because not all people of a nation are going to be bad or want revenge, I think that since he was a decedent that he shouldn't have been penalized Because he never made a threat or showed any signs of danger to anyone.
Explanation:
Law and morality are two normative systems that control and regulate behaviors in a human community so as to allow harmonious and effective intersubjectivity between individuals who recognize one another as bearers of rights. The values of any society are its own law. One of the purpoess of law is to provide a list of "norms" which constitute obligatory rules of behavior for the members of the society. These legal norms are closely related to various social values, being either a direct expression of them or serving them in a more indirect way.
Answer:
The best possible answer in this case is B, but that is not entirely correct.
Explanation:
Any premise for overthrowing an independent does not come from the preamble to the Declaration of Independence, but rather the second body paragraph. The Preamble merely states that the 13 colonies had reason to remove themselves from Britannia rather than explain that there are reasons for nations and states to seceed from others.
