Answer:
I believe the best answer to be letter D) Therefore, Wilson's argument that technology makes it more difficult for students to concentrate is thoroughly
researched and provides ample supporting evidence.
Explanation:
We can choose the option above through simple elimination. Option A is not a conclusion at all; it seems to present the final argument of the article, which means it's still part of the development. Letter B presents a "weak" personal opinion which could be a conclusion if it weren't based on personal experience instead of on the arguments offered in the article. Letter C looks more like a thesis statement than a conclusion, in the sense that is presents the topic of the article but not what can be concluded from it. Therefore, letter D seems to be the best option. That is the conclusion of a person who read the article, their evaluation of it: that it was well researched and filled with solid evidence.
Answer:
IN EXPLANATION :D
Explanation:
I believe people should be legally required to get vaccines. I believe so for a few reasons. To keep everyone safe from sicknesses, such as the flu or tetanus, they would need vaccines. Making these vaccines legally required would lower everyone's chances of contracting such illnesses. It would keep everyone safer. It would also make it much easier to stop surges of illnesses. In conclusion, people should be legally required to get vaccines to lower chances of illnesses and to keep others as safe as possible.
A lion would have to be one of the most dangerous animals to hunt. Not only are they extremely intelligent, but most lions are separated into prides. Not to mention, a lion can cover 100 yards in 3 to 4 seconds which is crazy fast and extremely overpowered with their overbearing strength. This is why I believe lions are one of the most dangerous animals in the world to hunt.
His forward-looking-attitiude without-a-doubt makes him an asset to the committee.
Answer:
I do not see any excerpt, So sorry but i dont think anyone can help
