Write a paragraph in which you argue whether or not Rainsford’s final action in "The Most Dangerous Game” is justifie

1 answer:

8 0

There is nothing to suggest that Zaroff would have quit killing humans, he was a static character, and therefore he did not change even when he "lost" to Rainsford. In the reading, Rainsford is doing his part to mankind by eliminating the harrowing threat of Zaroff to any other unfortunate person, and after all there is no legal justice system to persecute Rainsford on the island. If Rainsford did not kill Zaroff, then inevitably he would have died.

You might be interested in

Dr. Seward has a strange case he’s working on—describe his patient and some of the strange things Renfield is doing.

pentagon [3]

Answer:

Dr. Seward has a strange case with his patient R. M. Renfield. He is a strong man. Renfield has a habit of eating living things, which Dr. Seward named 'zoophagous.'

Explanation:

'Dracula' is a novel written by Bram Stoker. In the novel Dr. Seward works as an administrator is an insane asyllum. He has a strange case with one of his patients whose name is R. M. Renfield.

R. M. Renfield is a fifty-nine year old madman who has come under the influence of Dracula which made him do strange things such as cosuming flies, spiders, sparrows, etc. He is a man of great strength, as described by Dr. Seward.

Dr Seward writes in his diary that the case of Renfield is strange because he has a strange habit of eating living things stating that he gets their energy by consuming these creatures. Dr. Seward called his habit 'zoophagous' which means to feed on other animals.

3 0

3 years ago

What are two characters motivations in “what, of this goldfish, would you wish?”

Lana71 [14]

The two characters motivations are

6 0

3 years ago

Select the correct answer.

Brilliant_brown [7]

Answer:

A is the answer as in documents like CVs its like that

3 0