Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
a: is not proportional
because you cant divide any of the tope numbers by the bottom numbers so u can leave the thing blanc.
b: is proportional
becuase you can divide the top and bottom by 30 so the answer is 30
hope this help :)
Answer:
ok here is the answer 3 3/6
Step-by-step explanation:
By Angle-Angle simlilarity postulate :
If two angles of one triangle congruent to two angles of another, then triangles must be similar.
So, I think the answer is
<span>All isosceles triangles are not similar. The pair of congruent angles within one triangle is not necessarily congruent to the pair of congruent angles within the other triangle.
Because two base angles in </span>isosceles triangle are congruent, but it could be a lot of isosceles triangles that have different congruent base angles.
For example,
45-45-90 is an isosceles triangle, and 30-30-120 is an isosceles triangles, but they do not have 2 congruent angles.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
A) Let x represent acres of pumpkins, and y represent acres of corn. Here are the constraints:
x ≥ 2y . . . . . pumpkin acres are at least twice corn acres
x - y ≤ 10 . . . . the difference in acreage will not exceed 10
12 ≤ x ≤ 18 . . . . pumpkin acres will be between 12 and 18
0 ≤ y . . . . . the number of corn acres is non-negative
__
B) If we assume the objective is to maximize profit, the profit function we want to maximize is ...
P = 360x +225y
__
C) see below for a graph
__
D) The profit for an acre of pumpkins is the highest, so the farmer should maximize that acreage. The constraint on the number of acres of pumpkins comes from the requirement that it not exceed 18 acres. Then additional profit is maximized by maximizing acres of corn, which can be at most half the number of acres of pumpkins, hence 9 acres.
So profit is maximized for 18 acres of pumpkins and 9 acres of corn.
Maximum profit is $360·18 +$225·9 = $8505.