The Federalists wanted a strong government and strong executive branch, while the anti-Federalists wanted a weaker central government. The Federalists did not want a bill of rights they thought<span> the new constitution was </span>sufficient<span>.</span>
Answer: (lol i'm from Europe its A)
Explanation:
"Like other settled, agrarian societies in history, those in the Indian subcontinent have been attacked by nomadic tribes throughout its long history. In evaluating the impact of Islam on the sub-continent, one must note that the northwestern sub-continent was a frequent target of tribes raiding from Central Asia. In that sense, the Muslim intrusions and later Muslim invasions were not dissimilar to those of the earlier invasions during the 1st millennium."
<span>Richard M. Frye, "Pre-Islamic and Early Islamic Cultures in Central Asia", in </span>Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective<span>, ed. Robert L. Canfield (Cambridge U. Press c. 1991), 35–53.</span>"
So, MUSLIMS is the answer, does it have this option?
The Cash and Carry policy was "A. a provision in the Neutrality Act of 1937 which permitted the U.S. to sell nonmilitary goods to warring nations, if
<span>the nations paid in cash and shipped the goods themselves," although this was actually separate from the original Neutrality Act of 1936. </span>