Im guessing they were called "wagon trains". Apologies if i'm incorrect!
Ow did you not die to die to happy
They moved from place to place to find food. In my point of view
On August 6, 1945, the United States detonated<span> an </span>atomic bomb<span> over the Japanese city of </span>Hiroshima<span>. Sixteen hours later, American President </span>Harry S. Truman<span> called again for Japan's surrender, warning them to "expect a rain of ruin from the air, the like of which has never been seen on this earth."</span>
Answer:
Explanation:
This is tough and requires a level of interpretation. I will refer to the modifications in the box as 1-3 in the order they are listed and the possible answers I will refer as a-d in the order they are listed. Lets analyze:
First the question; it's asking us, based on 1-3, which one of a-d are the most true to answer the question, "why did the colonist modify the environment?"
I will start with what is most false and work to find our answer. B is not the answer. Nothing in 1, 2, or 3 applies specifically to protection.
C is not the best choice. While 1 and 3 could apply, 2 simply does not.
D is a tough one. It could be argued that the impact of all 3 answers are to encourage development of the trade we with England, but that is relying on outside information not provided to us. The statements 1, 2 and 3 have no specific mention of britain or trading.
That leaves A. 1 says clearing forests for lumber. Lumber is an economic good. 2 is also a economic good. 3 applies to transportation of goods as well as the town's that are needed for people to live and trade goods and services.
I believe answer A is the best choice.
