Hey you didn’t upload the image, upload again and I’ll gladly help
Greece is very hilly so it was hard for the ancients greeks to farm the land and use crops as a main source of food so instead they use sea food as a main source of food since they are sorounded by the ocean.
Haitian rebellion was a revolt consisting of 10,000 slaves approximately against the tyrannical rule of France that lasted long 15 years, it concluded in 1789. It was significant and frightening to some because the Haitians defeated Napoleon Bonaparte's army and abolished slavery, becoming the only nation in the world established as a result of a slave revolt and the first Latin American country to successfully rebel against France rule.
France and other European powers feared that the black people's determination and success would serve as an example for others slaves and people under their dominion and tyrannical rule to rebel as well.
Answer:
Most archaeological digs are financed by B. organizations that support academic endeavors.
Explanation:
First of all, archeological digs are a source of disciplinary research. They take part in many other studies to prove theories experts formulate. And even though they are cheaper than biological or engineering studies they are less popular, supported and promoted.
It is not because they are not important, because they are. But because there are not the same amount of organizations that impulse them. In other words, they don't have as many benefactors as studies from different disciplines.
To finish, Archeological studies depend on many times in foundations, governments or cultural enrichment movements that look for their development and execution. Many times it involves museums, associations and celebrities, politicians or royalty.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
During the times of NAFTA, the North America Free Trade Agreement between México, Canada, and the United States, many people opposed the treaty and questioned President Bill Clinton about it.
Nader and Buchanan opposed the ratification of NAFTA. This influenced what Clinton said in his speech of September 14, 1993. On that day, President Clinton signed two supplements that were included in the Free Trade Agreement.
President Clinton’s speech addressed the arguments against NAFTA that Nader and Buchanan made in that hehe said it was not true that the trade meant just moving out jobs from the US to México. And he clearly explained that Mexicans with lower income than Germans or Europeans spent more in US products, more than those Europeans and Canadians.
