Hey yall, how yall doin?.....

Dozier Company produced and sold 1,000 units during its first month of operations. It reported the following costs and expenses

Flauer [41]

Answer:

Required 1

Part a

Total Product cost = Variable manufacturing costs + Fixed manufacturing costs

where,

Variable manufacturing costs = ($84,000 + $42,500 + $21,000) ÷ 1,000 units = $147.50

Fixed manufacturing costs = $32,500 ÷ 1,000 units = $32.50

therefore,

Total Product cost = $147.50 + $32.50 = $180.00

Part b

Total period cost = variable non- manufacturing costs + fixed non-manufacturing costs

where,

variable non- manufacturing costs = $15,000 + $5,500 = $20,500

fixed non-manufacturing costs = $24,000 + $28,000 = $52,000

therefore,

Total period cost = $20,500 + $52,000 = $72,500

Required 2

Part a

total direct manufacturing cost = Direct Materials + Direct Labor + Direct (Variable) Manufacturing Overheads

therefore,

total direct manufacturing cost = $84,000 + $42,500 + $21,000 = $147,500

Part b

total indirect manufacturing cost = fixed manufacturing costs

therefore

total indirect manufacturing cost = $32,500

Required 3

Part a

total manufacturing cost = variable manufacturing cost + fixed manufacturing costs

therefore,

total manufacturing cost = $84,000 + $42,500 + $21,000 + $32,500 = $180,000

Part b

total non-manufacturing cost = variable non-manufacturing cost + fixed non-manufacturing cost

therefore,

total non-manufacturing cost = $20,500 + $52,000 = $72,500

Part c

total conversion cost = direct labor cost + manufacturing overheads

therefore,

total conversion cost = $42,500 + $21,000 + $32,500 = $96,000

prime cost = direct material + direct labor

therefore,

prime cost = $84,000 + $42,500 = $126,500

Required 4

Part a

total variable manufacturing cost = direct materials + direct labor + variable manufacturing costs

therefore,

total variable manufacturing cost = $84,000 + $42,500 + $21,000 = $147,500

Part b

total fixed cost = fixed manufacturing costs + fixed non-manufacturing costs

therefore,

total fixed cost = $32,500 + $52,000 = $84,500

Part c

variable cost per unit produced and sold = variable manufacturing cost + variable non-manufacturing

therefore,

variable cost per unit produced and sold = $147.50 + ($20,500 ÷ 1,000) = $168.00

Required 5

incremental manufacturing costs = variable manufacturing costs

therefore,

incremental manufacturing cost = ($84,000 + $42,500 + $21,000) ÷ 1,000 units = $147.50

8 0

3 years ago

If the world's population increased exponentially from 5.937 billion in 1998 to 6.771 billion in 2008 and continued to increase

Vaselesa [24]

Answer:

The world's population would have been 7.1137 billion in 2012, and this is 0.0437 billion (i.e. 7.1137 - 7.07 = 0.0437) higher compared to the population reference bureau estimate of 7.07 billion in July 2012.

Explanation:

This can be computed using the following exponential formula:

P(t) = P(0)a^t ............................ (1)

Where;

P(t) = World population in year t.

P(0) = World population in year 0 which is 1998 = 5.937 billion

a = base = ?

t = number of years

Substituting the value into equation (1), we have:

P(t) = 5.937 * a^t .......................................... (2)

Since we have 10 years from 1998 to 2008 (i.e. 2008 - 1998 = 10), we have:

P(t) = P(10) = World population in 2008 = 6.771 billion

t = 10

Substituting the value into equation (2) and solve for a, we have:

6.771 = 5.937 * a^10

a^10 = 6.771 / 5.937

a^10 = 1.1405

a = $\sqrt[10]{1.405}$

a = 1.013

Since we have 14 years from 1998 to 2012 (i.e. 2012 - 1998 = 14), we now have:

P(t) = P(14) = World population in 2012 = ?

P(0) = World population in year 0 which is 1998 = 5.937 billion

a = 1.013 as already calculated above

t = 14

Substituting the value into equation (1), we have:

P(14) = 5.937 * 1.013^14

P(14) = 5.937 * 1.192

P(14) = 7.1137 billion

Therefore, the world's population would have been 7.1137 billion in 2012, and this is 0.0437 billion (i.e. 7.1137 - 7.07 = 0.0437) higher compared to the population reference bureau estimate of 7.07 billion in july 2012.

6 0

3 years ago

Which of the following would NOT cause a shift in supply? A. changes in the price of inputs B. changes in the price of other goo

adell [148]

Answer:

C.

Explanation:

The correct answer would be changes in consumer input.

The supply of a good can be influenced by changes in the price of inputs for that goods, changes in the price of substitute goods, as well as changes in technology that positively or negatively affect the production of such goods.

What will not affect the supply of any good is changes to consumer's input. An input generally referred to a substance that is required to produce an output. Unless the consumer of a good is also the producer of that good, a consumer's input will not impact the supply of a product.

The correct option is C.

4 0

3 years ago

Suppose Russia and Sweden each produce only paper and cars. Russia can produce 8 tons of paper or 4 million cars each year. Swed

azamat

Answer:

Attached grap with point A and B.

Explanation:

Russia will produce the cars as their production has te lower opportunity cost:

(Note: Opportunity cost is the amount of production resigned for the current output)

Sweden pportunity cost for production car:

25 ton of papper / 5 m cars = 5 tons per millon of cars

Russia pportunity cost for production car:

8 ton of papper / 4 m cars = 2 tons per millon of cars

With the trade set at 2 millon car for 6 tons of paper we get the following

Sweden produce 25 tons - 6 traded = 19

and receive 2 millon car

Russia produce 4 millon car - 2 traded = 2

and receive 6 tons of pappers

8 0

3 years ago

Unlike the early stock exchanges, National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System (NASDAQ) has never:

Leya [2.2K]

Unlike the early stock exchanges, National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System (NASDAQ) has never maintained a physical trading location where dealers meet to trade securities.

8 0

3 years ago