I hope I can help! :)
(I do not own the definitions by the way)
Definitions:
Bird's-eye is an elevated view of an object from above, with a perspective as though the observer were a bird, often used in the making of blueprints, floor plans, and maps. It can be an aerial photograph, but also a drawing.
Eye-level is the axis around which a perspective drawing is constructed. When we are outdoors we use the horizon as a point of reference to judge the scale and distance of objects in relation to us. In perspective drawing, the horizon also happens to be the viewer's eye-level.
High-angle shot is a cinematic technique where the camera looks down on the subject from a high angle and the point of focus often gets "swallowed up." High-angle shots can make the subject seem vulnerable or powerless when applied with the correct mood, setting, and effects.
Low-angle is a shot from a camera angle positioned low on the vertical axis, anywhere below the eye line, looking up. Sometimes, it is even directly below the subject's feet. Psychologically, the effect of the low-angle shot is that it makes the subject look strong and powerful.
To answer your question, the answer would be low-angle! 
Have a great day/evening/night! :)
Let me know if you have any additional questions!
-Kappifilms
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Option B "Descartes believe that intellect is innate" would be the correct option.
Explanation:
- Both the European thinkers why anyone in the seventeenth century formulated interesting insights into the human experience as well as intelligence in the particular circumstance of Descartes, and even in the scenario of Locke throughout the 18th.
- While the theories relating to relevant topics have been suggested by both philosophers, whose thoughts varied greatly, Descartes assumed that information was connected to a set of concepts that are inherent in humans and that perceptions became intangible and therefore shouldn't be respected.
- Across the other contrary, Locke believed that there had been no inherent intellect but rather philosophies even though it was the opportunity and indeed the perception that helped living creatures to teach pronunciation.
Therefore a crucial distinction amongst Locke's versus Descartes' views is whether Descartes claims whether the rationality is inherent, although Locke claims that it becomes not inherent but related to their senses.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
wild thoughts wild wild thoughts