I think it would be true to look at the tentative thesis in a different light to find the answers inside yourself
This 'short essay' is basically asking you create a piece of writing, convincing your audience of your point. For example; I firmly believe that every single country should not have nuclear bombs. In general, I'd include:
*Nuclear Bomb Simulator to give an image I how much damage it does. What this does is, people tend to hate destructive behaviours. By showing them how much damage it does, you're appealing to their sense of emotion by conjuring a sense of panic.
*Death counts from previous wars to further reinforce the emotion of panic, sadness, and awareness. Death count for those individuals who demand solid scientific evidence.
In a nutshell, basically, include statistics (supports your argument with logical data that's already proven), history from past events if possible (to appeal to one's emotions), and if possible, choose evidence that's more modernized to further prove your point. Why so? Simply because it proves that the problem still persists, no matter how advanced in technology we are. in this case, nuclear bombs are going to be dangerous, regardless of how "modernized" we all are.
Answer:
He was trying to achieve peace he didn't want any violence he just wanted people to settle down so he called the cops.
Explanation:
Uhm don't know if this is right but tried.
Answer:it was you’re mom jk it was homer
Explanation:
When the author said "the cause of America" is "the
cause of all mankind, he is refereeing o the worldwide plight of people under oppressive
government and all of those individuals are struggling against them, the
struggle for the cause of America is a symbolic statement for the struggle for
the cause of humanity worldwide wherever the same kind of circumstances are
found.
