<span>Rather than tell people that Winterbourne is basically having a mistress while away in Geneva, his friends decide to simply just tell people that he is away studying. This also helps to prevent Winterbourne from sounding like the typical rich, idle slacker that people often associate with the wealthy.</span>
Answer:
Guglielmo Marconi. Guglielmo Marconi raced against Nikola Tesla to develop a working radio; Alexander Graham Bell;
Explanation:
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
The doctrine of nullification was coined by Vice President of South Carolina, John C. Calhoun in 1828, by anonymously drafting a pamphlet titled 'South Carolina Exposition and Protest.'
According to the doctrine of nullification, the states had the right to null and void any of federal laws within state limits. In November, 1832, South Carolina adopted the Ordinances of Nullification making the tariff on imported goods null, void, and unconstitutional.
So, the best definition of nullification is in option B. Therefore, option B is correct.
Answer:
The Court ruled that the ban on affirmative action in the Michigan Constitution is Constitutional.
Explanation:
The Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action is a case of affirmation, race and sex discrimination in public university admission.
On the 22nd of April, 2014 the court held that fourteenth Amendment's equal protection Clause does not prevent states from enacting bans on affirmation in education.
According to Justice Scalia, '' Constitution [forbids] government discrimination on the basis of race, and state-provided education is no exception''. Justice Scalia believe that the people in Michigan followed the understanding of the clause as their fundamental law.
Other court associate Justice include; Clarence Thomas, Stephen Breyer, Samuel Alito, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Anthony Kennedy and Ruth Badder Ginsburg. The Chief Justice for the case then is John Roberts.
To prove frauds, we need to show that <span>The innocent party relied on the wrongdoer's representation.
If the accused in fraud case represent true representation despite the negative effect that experienced by the accuser than the court will rule that the accuser just make a really bad business decision rather than being scammed.</span>
